M/S. CONTINENTAL WAREHOUSING CORPORATION LIMITED vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty granted to the assessee to revive it if necessary.
What were the facts?
The assessee, M/s. Continental Warehousing Corporation Limited, filed an appeal before the High Court of Karnataka. The appeal arose from an order passed by the Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal for the Assessment Year 2006-07.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the appeal filed by the assessee against the ITAT's order. However, the appeal was withdrawn by the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2020 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD I.T.A. NO.200 OF 2018 BETWEEN: M/S. CONTINENTAL WAREHOUSING CORPORATION LIMITED REP. BY ITS SRI. D. MALLIKARJUNA REDDY # 595, 1ST FLOOR DR. RAJKUMAR ROAD, PRAKASHNAGAR BENGALURU-560021 PAN: AAACC 8411 E. .... APPELLANT (BY SRI. V. CHANDRASHEKAR, ADV., & SRI. M LAVA, ADV.,) AND: THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-11(2), BMTC BUILDING 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA 6TH BLOCK, BENGALURU-560095. ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI. K.V. ARAVIND, ADV.,) - - - THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SEC. 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 10.11.2017 PASSED IN ITA NO.736/BANG/2010 (APPELLANT APPEAL) AND ITA NO.768/BANG/2010 (RESPONDENT APPEAL) FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-07 (VIDE ANNEXURE-A), PRAYING TO:
2 (i) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW AS STATED ABOVE AND ANSWER THE SAME FAVOUR OF THE APPELLANT. (ii) TO ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE FINDINGS THEREIN TO THE EXTENT AGAINST THE APPELLANT IN THE COMMON ORDER PASSED BY THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, 'C' BENCH, BANGALORE IN ITA NO.736/BANG/2010 (APPELLANT APPEAL) AND ITA NO.768/BANG/2010 (RESPONDENT APPEAL) DATED 10.11.2017 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-07 (ANNEXURE-A). (iii) PASS SUCH OTHER ORDERS, AS THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT AND PROPER TO MEET THE ENDS OF JUSTICE. THIS I.T.A. COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Mr.V.Chandrashekar, learned counsel for the assessee. Mr.K.V.Aravind, learned counsel for the revenue. Learned counsel for the assessee has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal. The aforesaid memo is taken on record. 2. For the reasons assigned in the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the assessee to revive the same if occasion so arises. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE RV
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026