WIPRO LIMITED vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court held that the substantial question of law raised in the appeal had already been decided in favour of the assessee by a previous judgment of the same court. Consequently, the ITAT's order was quashed.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Wipro Limited, appealed against an ITAT order concerning the computation of deduction under Section 80-IC for AY 2011-2012. The core issue was whether 'other income' of eligible undertakings should be excluded from the deduction calculation.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether 'other income' of eligible undertakings should be excluded when computing the deduction allowable under Section 80-IC of the Income Tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cited by 3 judgments on BharatTax
See all citing judgments →Counted from the text of the judgments hosted here. Most recent first.
- Cenduit (India) Services Private Limited, Bangalore v. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-2(1)(1)…Bangalore · 2022-01-12
- M/S Novozymes South Asia Pvt Ltd, Bangalore v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle-5(1)(1), BangaloreBangalore · 2021-06-29
- M/S Novozymes South Asia Pvt Ltd, Bangalore v. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (OSD) Circle-5(1)(1)…Bangalore · 2021-06-29
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2021 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR ITA NO. 39 OF 2021 BETWEEN: WIPRO LIMITED 76P AND 80P, DODDAKANNELLI, SARJAPUR ROAD, BENGALURU - 560035, REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ITS VICE PRESIDENT CORPORATE TAX MR BALASUBRAMANIAN K, PAN AAACWO387R. ... APPELLANT (BY SRI CHYTHANYA K.K, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
CIRCLE 7(1)(2), BANGALORE,
BMTC BUILDING, 2ND FLOOR,
KORAMANGALA 80 FEET ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560095. 2. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF
INCOME TAX, BENGALURU
BMTC BUILDING, 6TH BLOCK,
KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU - 560095.
... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI E I SANMATHI, ADVOCATE) THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 05/10/2020 PASSED IN IT(TP)A NO.609/BANG/2016, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-2012 PRAYING TO: A) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW STATED ABOVE. B) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET-ASIDE, TO THE EXTENT QUESTIONED HEREIN THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED: 05/10/2020 PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, 'C' BENCH, BENGALURU IN IT(TP)A NO. NO.609/BANG/2016 (ANNEXURE-C), ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-2012 AND ETC., THIS ITA COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Mr. Chythanya K.K., learned counsel for the assessee. Mr. E.I.Sanmathi learned counsel for the revenue. This appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act for short) has been filed by the assessee against the order dated 5.10.2020 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The subject matter of the appeal pertains to the Assessment year 2011-
3 2012. The appeal is admitted to consider the following substantial question of law: "1. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and on the grounds raised, the Tribunal was justified in holding that other income of the eligible undertakings of the Appellant is to be excluded while computing the deduction allowable under Section 80-IC of the Act despite this Hon'ble Court holding that other income is to be taken into consideration while computing the deduction allowable under the said Section 80-IC of the Act" ?
When the matter was taken up today, the learned counsel for the assessee submitted that the aforesaid substantial question of law involved in this appeal has already been answered in favour of the assessee by this Court vide judgment dated 9.12.2020 passed in ITA No.191/2017. 3. The aforesaid submission could not be disputed by the learned counsel for the revenue.
For the reasons assigned in the afore-mentioned
4 judgment dated 9.12.2020 passed in ITA No.191/2017, the order dated 5.10.2020 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for the assessment year 2011-2012 is hereby quashed. In the result, appeal is allowed. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE HR
More judgments on Section 80-IC
- Gmp Technical Solutions Private Limited… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, MumbaiITA 6155/MUM/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
- Lsj Biotech Private Limited, Igc, Aidc… vs Incometax Officer, Ward-1, Aayakar Bhawan…ITA 465/GTY/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed3 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
- ACIT, Rajkot vs Crystal Global Industries, RajkotITA 538/RJT/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed31 Aug 2026AY 2014-15
- ACIT, Rajkot vs Crystal Global Industries, RajkotITA 537/RJT/2025[2013]Status: Disposed31 Aug 2026
- Crystal Global Industries, Rajkot vs ACIT, Circle-2(1), RajkotITA 508/RJT/2025[2011-12]Status: Disposed31 Aug 2026AY 2011-12
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- Akshaya Consortium vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026