Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s. Chebrolu Agros Private Limited
What did the High Court hold?
The Tribunal held that the processing and drying of tobacco is a manufacturing activity. Therefore, it is eligible for deduction under Section 80HH of the Income Tax Act.
What were the facts?
The appeals were filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal had upheld the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).
What were the issues?
Whether the processing and drying of tobacco constitutes a manufacturing activity eligible for deduction under Section 80HH of the Income Tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Premier Tobacco Packers Pvt. Ltd.10 citing284 ITR 222 · 2006 · HC
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI
I.T.T.A.Nos.116 of 2012 & 434 of 2011
DATED: 9.7.2013
Between: Commissioner of Income Tax, Hyderabad.
… Appellant
And
M/s.Chebrolu Agros Pvt. Ltd., … Respondent Guntur.
…Respondent
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI
I.T.T.A.Nos.116 of 2012 & 434 of 2011
Common Judgment: (per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta)
We have heard the learned counsel for the appellant and gone through the impugned judgment and order of the learned Tribunal. We are not inclined to admit the appeals and we dismiss the same for the following reasons: The learned Tribunal has found that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has decided the matters following the judgment of the Madras High Court in the case of C.I.T. vs. Premier Tobacco Packers Pvt. Ltd., reported
in 284 ITR 222, wherein it has been held that the processing and drying of tobacco is a manufacturing activity and is eligible for deduction under Section 80HH of the Income Tax Act. Therefore, no question of law involved for decision of this Court. The appeals are accordingly dismissed.
___________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
_________________ G. ROHINI, J
09.07.2013 pnb
More judgments on Section 80HH
- ACIT, Circle-3(2), New Delhi vs Asian Consolidated Inds.Ltd), RewariITA 7501/DEL/2018[1995-96]Status: Disposed27 Aug 2025AY 1995-96
- DCIT, Circle-3(2), New Delhi vs Asian Consolidated Inds.Ltd), RewariITA 4514/DEL/2018[1993-94]Status: Disposed27 Aug 2025AY 1993-94
- DCIT, Circle-3(2), New Delhi vs Asian Consolidated Inds.Ltd), RewariITA 6218/DEL/2017[1994-95]Status: Disposed27 Aug 2025AY 1994-95
- M/S. Bajaj Auto Ltd., Mumbai vs DCIT RG. - 3(1), MumbaiITA 7341/MUM/2005[1997-1998]Status: Disposed12 Nov 2024AY 1997-1998
- DCIT RG. 3(1), Mumbai vs M/S. Bajaj Auto Ltd., MumbaiITA 7226/MUM/2005[1997-1998]Status: Disposed12 Nov 2024AY 1997-1998
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Akshaya Consortium vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026
- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026