Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr.M.P. No. 327 of 2013
Vikash Kumar Sinha ….…… Petitioner
Versus
Union of India through Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand …… Opp. Party
With Cr.M.P. No. 2674 of 2012
Gita Korah @ Geeta Kora @ Gita Kora ….…… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand 2. Union of India through Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Jamshedpur …… Opp. Parties With Cr.M.P. No. 2453 of 2013
Shashmita Das @ Sosmita Dash ….…… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand 2. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-II, Ranchi. …… Opp. Parties
--------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
--------- For the Petitioners : M/s Vishnu Kumar Sharma, Salil Sitanshu, Sanjay Kumar and Vinay Prakash, Advocates (in Cr.M.P. No. 327/2013) M/s Suraj Kumar, Advocate ( in Cr.M.P 2674/2012) Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advocate (in Cr.M.P. No. 2453/2013)
For the State : Mrs. Ruby Pandey, A.P.P. (in Cr.M.P. Nos. 327/13 & 2674/12) Mr. Ravi Prakash, Spl. P.P. ( in Cr.M.P. No. 2453/2013) For the Income Tax Dept. : Mr. Ratenesh Nandan Sahay, Advocate ( in all cases). ……………..
11/Dated: 18/08/2023
Cr.M.P. No. 327 of 2013 & Cr.M.P. No. 2674 of 2012
Cr.M.P. No. 327 of 2013 is arising out of Complaint Case No. 10 of 2012 and Cr.M.P. No. 2674 of 2012 is arising out of Complaint Case No. 02 of 2012. 2. After some arguments, learned counsels for the petitioners seek permission to withdraw these petitions with liberty to to take all the grounds at appropriate stage. 3. Learned counsels for the State and Income Tax Department have got
no objection. 4. Accordingly, both Cr.M.P. Nos. 327 of 2013 and Cr.M.P. No. 2674 of 2012 are permitted to be withdrawn and disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. Pending I.A, if any, stands disposed of. Interim orders passed in respective cases are vacated. Cr.M.P. No. 2453 of 2013
Cr.M.P. No. 2453 of 2013 is arising out of Complaint Case No. 12 of 2012. 6. Mr. Rahul Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that he will file appropriate petition in view of Circular of 1992 as the amount in question involved in this case is below Rs. 25,000/-. He seeks permission to withdraw this petition. 7. In view of such submissions this petition is permitted to be withdrawn and disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move before the learned court by way of filing appropriate petition. 8. Pending I.A. if any, stands disposed of.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Satyarthi/