COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SMT. H.B.SUDHA
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court ordered that needful action be done during the day. Failing this, the appeal would stand dismissed without reference to the Bench.
What were the facts?
The Commissioner of Income Tax filed an appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act against an ITAT order. The appeal sought to set aside the ITAT's decision and confirm the order of the Deputy Commissioner.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the appeal filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax would be dismissed due to non-compliance with the court's procedural order.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2007
PRESENT
HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE V.GOPALAGOWDA
AND
HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE ARALI NAGARAJ
ITA NO 930 OF 2006
BETWEEN
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
CENTRAL CIRCLE,
C.R.BUILDING,
QUEENS ROAD,
BENGALURU.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,
CENTRAL CIRCLE – I,
C.R. BUILDING,
QUEENS ROAD,
BENGALURU. ... APPELLANT (S)
(By Sri. M.V. SESHACHALA, ADVOCATE)
..2..
- - ITA No.930/2006 2 AND
SMT. H.B.SUDHA, NO.26-A/2, SANKEY ROAD, BENGALURU. ... RESPONDENT(S)
The advocate for the appellant has filed the above ITA Under Sec.260-A of Income Tax Act 1961, arising out of order dated 14.09.2005 passed in ITA No.327/Beng/2002, for the Assessment Year 1997-98, praying this Hon'ble Court to:
i. formulate the substantial questions of law stated above,
ii. allow the appeal and set aside the orders passed by the ITAT, Bengaluru in ITA No.327/Beng/2002 dated 14.09.2005 and confirming the order of the Appellate Commissioner and confirm the order passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle (1), Bengaluru.
..3..
- - ITA No.930/2006 3
This ITA is coming on for Orders, this day, the Court made the following:
ORDER
Needful shall be done during the course of the day, failing which the appeal stands dismissed without reference to the Bench.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
Ty. By : H.M.N R. By : V.K C. By : D.P.S
Ty.Date : 21/1/15
Copy C. Date : 22/1/15
Sd/-
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- U Days Garments vs. The Adjudication OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S Jsw Cement Limited,Jajpur vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sreeshobi Enterprises vs. The Appellate AuthorityMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- S.T.Promotors vs. The Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- Prashanti Das (M/S. Panchamukhi Enterprises) vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Jagatsinghpur CircleOrissa · 16 Oct 2026