THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S MALLIPORE INDIA P LTD
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court granted the appellant four weeks' time as a last chance to take necessary action. Failure to do so would result in the appeal being dismissed without further reference to the Court.
What were the facts?
The Commissioner of Income Tax filed an appeal before the High Court against an ITAT order. The ITAT had confirmed the order of the Appellate Commissioner, which in turn had confirmed the order of the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the High Court would grant further time for compliance, failing which the appeal would stand dismissed.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2007
PRESENT
HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE K.L.MANJUNATH
AND
HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE ARALI NAGARAJ
ITA NO 672 OF 2007
BETWEEN
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, C.R.BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BENGALURU – 560 001.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE - 12(1)
C.R. BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BENGALURU. ... APPELLANT (S)
(By Sri. M.V. SESHACHALA, ADVOCATE)
..2..
ITA No.672/2007 2 AND
M/S MILLIPORE INDIA PVT. LTD. NO.50A RING ROAD, PEENYA 2ND PHASE, BENGALURU – 58. ... RESPONDENT(S)
The advocate for the appellant has filed the above ITA Under Sec.260-A of Income Tax Act 1961, arising out of order dated 30.04.2007 passed in ITA No.1483/Beng/2005, for the Assessment year 2002-2003, praying this Hon'ble Court to:
i. formulate the substantial questions of law stated above,
ii. allow the appeal and set aside the order passed by the ITAT, in ITA No.1483/Beng/2005 dated 30.04.2007 confirming the order of the Appellate Commissioner & confirm the order passed by the Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle – 12(1), Bengaluru.
This ITA is coming on for Orders, this day, the Court made the following: ..3..
ITA No.672/2007 3 ORDER
As a last chance 4 weeks time is granted to do the needful.
If needful is not done within the stipulated time the appeal stands dismissed without reference to the Court.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
Ty. By : H.M.N R. By : V.K C. By : D.P.S
Ty.Date : 21/1/15
Copy C. Date : 22/1/15
Sd/-
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026