THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX vs. BANGALORE UNIVERSITY
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court granted the appellant one week's time to comply with office objections. Failure to do so would result in the appeal being deemed rejected without reference to the Bench.
What were the facts?
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) had passed an order on March 28, 2008, in ITA No. 398/Beng/2007 for the assessment year 2004-05. The Director of Income-Tax (Exemptions) and Deputy Director of Income Tax filed an appeal against this order.
What were the issues?
The appeal was filed against an ITAT order confirming a lower authority's decision. The primary issue was the compliance with procedural requirements for the appeal to be heard.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF JUNE, 2009
PRESENT
HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE V.GOPALAGOWDA
AND
HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH
ITA NO 808 OF 2008
BETWEEN
THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME – TAX, EXEMPTIONS, C.R. BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BENGALURU.
THE DEPUTY DRIECTOR OF INCOME TAX
(EXEMPTIONS),
CIRCLE 17(1), C.R.BUILDING,
QUEENS ROAD,
BENGALURU. ... APPELLANT (S)
(By Sri. M.V. SESHACHALA, ADVOCATE)
..2..
ITA No.808/2008 2 AND
BANGALORE UNIVERSITY, JNANABHARATHI, BENGALURU – 560 056. ... RESPONDENT
The advocate for the appellant has filed the above ITA Under Sec.260-A of Income Tax Act 1961, arising out of order dated 28.03.2008 passed in ITA No.398/Beng/2007, for the Assessment year 2004-05, praying this Hon'ble Court to: i. formulate the substantial questions of law stated above. ii. allow the appeal and set aside the order passed by the ITAT, Bengaluru in ITA No.398/Beng/2007 dated 28.03.2008 confirming the order of the Appellate Commissioner confirm the order passed by the Deputy Director of Income Tax, (Exemp) Circle-17(1), Bengaluru.
This ITA is coming on for Orders, this day, the Court made the following: ..3..
ITA No.808/2008 3 ORDER
One week’s time is granted to the appellant to comply with office objections, failing which, the appeal shall be deemed to be rejected without reference to the Bench.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
Ty. By : H.M.N R. By : V.K C. By : D.P.S
Copy Ty.Date : 22/01/15 C. Date : 22/01/15
Sd/-
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Vinay Singh vs. Union Of INDIAAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Aaradhyam Infrabuilders PVT LTD vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Its Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr The Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026