RAM PRAKASH,FIROZABAD vs. CIT APPEAL, SANJAY PLACE AGRA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 52/AGR/2023Status: HeardITAT Agra05 February 2025AY 2012-13Bench: SHRI M. BALAGANESH (Accountant Member)2 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found that the NFAC did not provide independent findings on whether the rectification issues fell under Section 154. Therefore, the appeal was restored to the NFAC for de novo adjudication.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the NFAC which confirmed the AO's rejection of a rectification application under Section 154. The NFAC decided the issue ex parte without adjudicating on merits.

What were the issues?

Whether the NFAC was justified in confirming the rejection of the rectification application under Section 154 without independent adjudication on merits.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 154

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AGRA BENCH “SMC”: AGRA

For Respondent: Shri Shalenndra Srivastava, Sr. DR
Hearing: 05/02/2025Pronounced: 05/02/2025

AY 2012-13, arises out of the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. NFAC’, in short] dated 25.05.2021 against the order of assessment passed u/s 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) dated 14.02.2020 by the Assessing Officer, ITO, Ward-2(2)(3), Firozabad (hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. AO’).

2.

The only effective issue to be decided in this appeal is as to whether the ld NFAC was justified in confirming the action of the ld AO in rejecting the rectification application u/s 154 of the Act in the facts and circumstances of the instant case.

3.

None appeared on behalf of the assessee. We have heard the ld DR and perused the materials available on record. On perusal of the order of the ld NFAC, we find that the ld NFAC had decided the issue ex parte without adjudicating the issue on merits giving its independent finding. There is no independent finding given by the ld NFAC as to how the issues that were sought to be rectified does not fall within the ambit of provisions of section 154 of the Act. Hence, in the interest of justice and fairplay, we deem it fit and appropriate to restore this appeal to file of ld NFAC for de novo adjudication in accordance with law. Needless to mention the assessee be given reasonable opportunity of being heard. The assessee is directed to cooperate with ld NFAC for expeditious disposal of the appeal by not taking unwarranted adjournments. Hence, the grounds raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.

4.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the open court on 05/02/2025.

More judgments on Section 154

All 8,676 judgments and leading authorities on Section 154 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →