SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT JAMNER,GUNA vs. ITO, GUNA
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that section 80AC underwent a statutory amendment effective from April 1, 2018, which requires filing the return on or before the due date prescribed under section 139(1). Since the assessment year in question is 2018-19 and there was no indication of retrospective effect of the amendment, the lower authorities erred in law and fact.
What were the facts?
The assessee appealed against the disallowance of their claim for section 80P deduction amounting to Rs. 26,46,190. The disallowance was based on the sole reason that the assessee had filed a belated return, making their case fall under section 80AC of the Act.
What were the issues?
Whether disallowing section 80P deduction for filing a belated return is justified in light of the amendment to section 80AC?
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AGRA BENCH, AGRA
Before: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara & Sh. M. Balaganesh
ORDER
Per Satbeer Singh Godara, Judicial Member:
This assessee’s appeal for Assessment Year 2018-19, arises against the CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi’s DIN & order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022-23/1049285838(1) dated 31.03.2023, in proceedings u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”).
Heard both the parties at length. Case file perused.
It emerges during the course of hearing with the able assistance coming from the assessee and the Revenue side that both the learned lower authorities have disallowed the assessee’s section 80P deduction claim amounting to
We have given our thoughtful consideration to the assessee’s and the Revenue’s respective stands. We find no reason to sustain the impugned disallowance. This is for the precise reason that section 80AC has undergone the statutory amendment to this effect that the concerned assessee to file the return on or before the due date prescribed u/s 139(1) vide the Finance Act, 2018 w.e.f. 01.04.2018 whereas we are in assessment year 2018-19. There is no indication coming from the Revenue side that the above aforesaid amendment carries any retrospective effect. That being the case, we accordingly hold that both the learned lower authorities have erred in law and on facts in declining the assessee’s section 80P deduction for the foregoing sole reason. Ordered accordingly.
This assessee’s appeal is allowed. Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 05/02/2025.
More judgments on Section 80P
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shri Na vs Ari Khedut Sahkari Society Ltd…ITA 362/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. V J Petro Products vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St) - IiiAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026