Commissioner of Income Tax [TDS] vs. The Executive Engineer
Cases cited in this judgment(9)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Woodward Governor India Pvt. Ltd.968 citing312 ITR 254 · 2009 · SC · Read judgment
- Taparia Tools Ltd. v. JCIT343 citing55 Taxmann.com 361 · 2015 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Biocon Ltd.242 citing121 Taxmann.com 351 · 2020 · HC
- DCIT v. Bank of Bahrain & Kuwait81 citing41 SOT 290 · 2010 · ITAT
- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BANGALORE v. ING VYSYA BANK LTD.25 citing114 Taxmann.com 506 · 2020 · HC
- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, HUBLI v. KARNATAKA VIKAS GRAMEEN BANK11 citing79 Taxmann.com 359 · 2017 · HC
- Oriental Bank of Commerce v. ACIT10 citing93 Taxmann.com 432 · 2018 · HC
- 26 Taxmann.com 2525 citing26 Taxmann.com 252 · 2012 · HC
- 110 Taxmann.com 3364 citing110 Taxmann.com 336 · 2019
Judgment text not available
The text for this order has not been extracted yet.
Similar judgments
Other orders that rely on the same authority or decide the same section.
- The Commissioner of Income-Tax vs M/S. Ing Vysya Bank LtdKarnataka27 Jun 2022Dismissed
Also relies on Oriental Bank of Commerce v. ACIT and 4 other authorities
The High Court held that securities held under 'held to maturity' are capital assets, software expenses are revenue in nature, ESOP liabilities are ascertained, contingent losses are allowable if written off, broken peri...
- The Commissioner of Income-Tax vs M/S Ing Vysya Bank LtdKarnataka8 Jul 2022Dismissed
Also relies on Oriental Bank of Commerce v. ACIT and 1 other authority
The High Court held that securities held under 'held to maturity' should be treated as stock-in-trade. It also held that expenses incurred in connection with the sale of shares had a nexus with the transfer and were perm...
- The Pr Commissioner of Income Tax, CIT(A) vs M/S South Canara DistrictKarnataka14 Dec 2021Dismissed
The High Court held that the assessee can compute income under a hybrid accounting system and that accrued interest on investments is not necessarily chargeable to tax. It also held that expenditure incurred for promotin...
- The Pr Commissioner of Income Tax CIT(A) vs M/S South Canara DistrictKarnataka14 Dec 2021Dismissed
The tribunal held that the assessee could follow a hybrid accounting system and that the expenses incurred were allowable under Section 37(1) as they were for promoting business. It also held that amortization premiums o...
- The Pr Commissioner of Income Tax CIT(A) vs M/S South Canara DistrictKarnataka14 Dec 2021Dismissed
The Tribunal held that the assessee can follow a hybrid system of accounting for computing business income, and that the expenditure incurred for promoting business, even if not strictly necessary, is allowable. It also ...
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S B.K. Agency Under The Proprietor Of Bhola Prasad vs. The Chief Commissioner, CGSTPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026