DR.D. JOHN PONNUDURAI EDUCATIONAL TRUST,CHENNAI vs. ITO, EXEMPTIONS WARD-3,, CHENNAI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the Ld.CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal without considering the merits, as the delay in filing was within the extended period due to the Covid-19 pandemic. The order of the Ld.CIT(A) was set aside.
What were the facts?
The assessee trust filed an appeal against the order of the Ld.CIT(A) which dismissed the appeal in limine due to delay. The assessee contended that the delay was within the exclusion period granted by the Supreme Court due to the Covid-19 pandemic.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the appeal before the Ld.CIT(A) was a valid ground for dismissal in limine, considering the Covid-19 exclusion period.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI ABY T. VARKEY & SHRI AMITABH SHUKLA
अपीलाथ� क� ओर से/ Appellant by : Mr.G. Tarun, Advocate ��यथ� क� ओर से /Respondent by : Ms. Gowthami Manivasagam, JCIT : सुनवाईक�तारीख/Date of Hearing 24.09.2024 : घोषणाक�तारीख /Date of Pronouncement 04.12.2024 आदेश / O R D E R
PER ABY T. VARKEY, JM:
This is an appeal preferred by the assessee Trust against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/NFAC, (hereinafter in short "the Ld.CIT(A)”), Delhi, dated 10.06.2024 for the Assessment Year (hereinafter in short "AY”) 2009-10.
At the outset, the Ld.AR of the assessee submitted that the Ld.CIT(A) has dismissed the appeal without going into the merits of the ground of appeal raised before him, rather the Ld CIT(A) has dismissed the appeal in limine only on the ground that assessee failed to show sufficient cause for the delay of ‘140’ days in filing of the appeal before him. In this regard, the Ld.AR brought to our notice that the Assessment Order was passed on 25.09.2021 meaning it comes within the exclusion period allowed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court considering the Covid-19 pandemic from 20.03.2020 onwards and up to 28.02.2022. Having noted that the assessee had filed the appeal on 14.03.2022 i.e. within 30 days from 28.02.2022 as noted supra, the assessee’s appeal preferred before the Ld.CIT(A) can’t be said to be hit by the limitation period held by the Ld.CIT(A). Therefore, the impugned order of the Ld.CIT(A) is found to be erroneous to that extent and therefore, we are inclined to set aside the impugned order of the Ld.CIT(A) and restore the appeal back to his file with a direction to proceed to adjudicate the grounds of appeal raised by the assesse as stipulated under sub-section (6) of section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee has undertaken to file the written submissions/relevant documents to substantiate its grounds of appeal.
The Ld.CIT(A) to pass speaking order in accordance to law after hearing the assessee.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- Akshaya Consortium vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026