No AI summary yet for this case.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2012 PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K.SREEDHAR RAO AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.MANOHAR INCOME TAX APPEAL No.37/2007
BETWEEN:
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE C.R.BUILDING QUEENS ROAD BANGALORE.
THE DEPUTY COMMISISIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-II C.R.BUILDING QUEENS ROAD BANGALORE.
... APPELLANTS
(By Sri E.SAMMATHI INDRA KUMAR, ADV.)
AND:
M/S.SABARI TRUST NO.21, CUNNINGHAM ROAD BANGALORE.
... RESPONDENT
(By M/S. K.R.PRASAD, Adv.)
This I.T.A. is filed under Section 260-A of I.T.Act, 1961 arising out of order dated 21-07-2006 passed in ITA.No.415/Bang/2002 for the Assessment Year 1998- 99, praying that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to:
i. Formulate the substantial questions of law stated therein,
ii. Allow the appeal and set aside the order passed by the ITAT Bangalore in ITA No.415/Bang/2002 dated 21.07.2006 confirming the order of Appellate Commissioner & confirm the order passed by the Dy. Commnr., of Income Tax, Central Circle-II, Bangalore in the interest of Justice and equity.
This Appeal coming on for hearing, on this day, SREEDHAR RAO, J., delivered the following:
J U D G M E N T
It is the contention of the respondent-assessee that the monetary limit is less than Rs.10,00,000/-. Hence the appeal is not maintainable.
The decision of this court in M/s. Ranka and Ranka Vs. C.I.T and Another is pending before Hon’ble Supreme Court in SLP No. 27468/2012.
Subject to the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in SLP No. 27468/201, the appeal is dismissed as not maintainable.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
Bsv