THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S KIRLOSKAR INVESTMENTS & FINANCE LTD

PDF · subscribers
ITA/463/2007HC KarnatakaKAHC01032661200705 November 2012Bench: B.V.PINTO,K.SREEDHAR RAO3 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court set aside the ITAT's order and remanded the matter back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh assessment. This decision was based on similar reasons as a previous case involving the same assessee for earlier assessment years.

What were the facts?

The Income Tax Department appealed an ITAT order for the assessment year 1999-2000. The appeal was filed against M/s. Kirloskar Investments & Finance Ltd.

What were the issues?

Whether the ITAT's order was correct and if a fresh assessment was warranted based on prior rulings for the same assessee.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 260-A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 05TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2012 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.SREEDHAR RAO AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.V.PINTO ITA No.463/2007 BETWEEN: 1 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, C.R.BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE. 2 THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(2), C.R. BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE. APPELLANTS (BY SRI K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE) AND: M/S. KIRLOSKAR INVESTMENTS & FINANCE LTD., II FLOOR, C BLOCK, UNITY BUILDING, J.C.ROAD,

2 BANGALORE. RESPONDENT (BY SRI K.S. JAYARAM, O.L.) This ITA is filed u/S.260-A of I.T.Act, 1961 arising out of Order dated 30-11-2006 passed in ITA No. 12/Bang/2005 for the Assessment Year 1999-00, praying that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to: (i) formulate the substantial questions of law stated therein and (ii) allow the appeal and set aside the order passed by the ITAT, Bangalore in ITA No.12/Bang/2005 dated 30-11-2006 & confirm the order of the Appellate Commissioner confirming the order passed by the Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle- 2(2), Bangalore, in the interest of justice and equity. This appeal is coming on for final hearing this day, SREEDHAR RAO, J., delivered the following: JUDGMENT Registry is directed to show the name of Sri K.S.Jayaram–Official liquidator for the respondent. 2. This court in I.T.A.No.3046/2005 has set aside the order in respect of the assessee in question for earlier assessment years and remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer for fresh assessment. For the similar reasons explained in I.T.A.No.3046/2005 this appeal is also partly allowed. The order is set aside. The matter is remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh assessment.

3 Sri K.S. Jayaram, the official Liquidator is permitted to file memo of appearance within four weeks. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE psg*

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →