No AI summary yet for this case.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 05TH DAY OF MARCH 2013
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.KUMAR
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.MANOHAR
ITA NO.1276/2006 c/w ITA NO.1277/2006
ITA NO.1276/2006
BETWEEN:
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, C.R.BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE.
THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER, (TDS)– 1, C.R.BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE.
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI.K.V.ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)
AND:
M/S.U.B.NETWORKS (BANGALORE) PVT. LTD., 1/1, VITTAL MALLYA ROAD, BANGALORE – 560 001. …. RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.MALLAHA RAO FOR S.PARTHASARATHI, ADVS)
ITA FILED U/S.260A OF I.T.ACT, 1961 ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 30-12-2005 PASSED IN ITA.NO.317/BANG/2001 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 1999-2000, PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN AND ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ITAT, BANGALORE IN ITA.NO.317/BANG/2001 DATED 30-12-2005 CONFIRMING THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER AND CONFIRMING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, (TDS)1 BANGALORE, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
ITA NO.1277/2006
BETWEEN:
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, C.R.BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE.
THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER, (TDS)– 1, C.R.BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE.
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI.K.V.ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)
AND:
M/S.U.B.NETWORKS (BANGALORE) PVT. LTD., 1/1, VITTAL MALLYA ROAD, BANGALORE – 560 001.
…. RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.MALLAHA RAO FOR S.PARTHASARATHI, ADVS)
ITA FILED U/S.260A OF I.T.ACT, 1961 ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 30-12-2005 PASSED IN ITA.NO.311/BANG/2001 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 1999-2000, PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN AND ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ITAT, BANGALORE IN ITA.NO.311/BANG/2001 DATED 30-12-2005 CONFIRM THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER AND CONFIRMING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, (TDS)1 BANGALORE, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THESE APPEALS ARE COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, N. KUMAR J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
These appeals are filed by the revenue challenging the order passed by the Tribunal holding that the assessee was not required to deduct tax at source as per Section 195 of the IT Act.
The tax effect involved in this appeal is Rs.8,04,354/- and interest amount of Rs.2,64,429/-. In view of the Instruction No.3/2011 dated 9.2.2011,
which fell for consideration before this court in the case of COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX v/s M/S. RANKA AND RANKA disposed of on 2nd November 2011 wherein it was held that the said instruction applies to the pending proceedings and if the tax effect is less than Rs.10,00,000/-, the appeal is not maintainable, these appeals are also not maintainable.
Following the aforesaid decision, these appeals are dismissed as not maintainable. However, liberty is reserved to the revenue to seek for its revival if the judgment of this court is reversed by the Apex Court.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
mpk/-*