AA509 KOONAMPATTI PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CO OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED,TIRUPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(1) ERODE, ERODE
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the lower authorities had not properly followed the principles of natural justice. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the assessee was granted one more opportunity before the Assessing Officer to present its case.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) NFAC, Delhi, which confirmed the assessment framed by the Income Tax Officer under section 144 read with section 147 for the assessment year 2012-13. The assessee contended that principles of natural justice were not followed by the lower authorities.
What were the issues?
Whether the principles of natural justice were followed by the Assessing Officer and CIT(A)? Whether the assessee should be granted an opportunity for denovo assessment?
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ (SMC
Before: HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL & HON’BLE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI
(िनधा�रणवष� / Assessment Year: 2012-2013) AA509 Koonampatti Primary Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Agricultural Co-operative Credit Ward 2(1) Society Limited, Erode K. Thottiyapalayam, Kavuthampalayam (PO) Kunnathur 638 109. Tamil Nadu [PAN: AACAA 0771B] (अपीलाथ�/Appellant) (��यथ�/Respondent) अपीलाथ� क� ओर से/ Appellant by : Mrs A. Vijayalakshmi, C.A., ��यथ� क� ओर से /Respondent by : Ms. T.M. Suganthamala, IRS, Addl. CIT. सुनवाई क� तार�ख/Date of Hearing : 11.12.2024 घोषणा क� तार�ख /Date of Pronouncement : 13.12.2024 आदेश / O R D E R PER MANU KUMAR GIRI (Judicial Member)
This appeal by the assessee is arising out of the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi in order No.ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023-24/1053368090 (1) dated 31.05.2023. The assessment was framed by the Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1) Erode for the assessment year 2012-13 u/s.144 rws 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter the ‘Act’), vide order dated 23.12.2019.
Before us, ld. Counsel for the appellant submitted that the ld. AO as well as the ld. CIT(A) had not properly followed the principles of natural justice in true spirit. Ld. Counsel for the appellant further prayed that if an adequate opportunity of hearing is given before ld.AO, assessee will prosecute the case in assessment proceedings properly. Per contra, the ld.Addl. CIT-DR relied upon the orders of the lower authorities and prayed for dismissal of appeal.
We have gone through the orders of lower authorities and submissions addressed by both parties before us. We are of the considered view that in the interest of justice assessee should be given one more opportunity before the Assessing Officer to prosecute his case. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and the appeal is restored back to the file of Ld. AO for denovo assessment on merits after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the assessee subject to cost of Rs.10,000/- which shall be deposited by the assessee within 30 days from the date of receipt of this order to ‘Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority’ at Hon’ble High Court of Madras. The proof of the same will be furnished by the Assessee before Ld.AO. The assessee is directed to substantiate its case forthwith without any fail, failing which Ld.AO shall be at liberty to proceed with the denovo assessment on merits.
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose.
Order pronounced in the open court on 13th day of December, 2024 at Chennai.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Priya, Townhall Road, Cuttack vs. Superintendent Cuttack- I Range, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026