ACIT., CIRCLE-2(1), GWALIOR vs. SH. SHIV KUMAR GUPTA,, INDORE
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessment was 'unabated' and additions were to be based on seized material. However, since no additions were made on the basis of specific seized material, the appeal was rejected.
What were the facts?
The Revenue's appeal for AY 2009-10 arises from an assessment framed under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, after a search on 07.10.2010. The Assessing Officer made additions based on this search.
What were the issues?
Whether additions made in assessment proceedings initiated under Section 153A are valid when not based on specific seized material found during a search.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Pr. CIT v. Abhisar Buildwell (P.) Ltd.2,379 citing454 ITR 212 · 2023 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AGRA BENCH, AGRA
Before: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara & Sh. M. Balaganesh
ORDER
Per Satbeer Singh Godara, Judicial Member:
This Revenue’s appeal for Assessment Year 2009-10, arises against the CIT(A), Gwalior’s in case No. 424 to 429/IT/2013- 14/Gwalior dated 30.09.2019, in proceedings u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”).
Heard both the parties at length. Case file perused.
Coming to the Revenue’s instant appeal, we note at the outset that the learned departmental authorities had conducted the search in question in assessee’s case on 07.10.2010 leading to initiation of Section 153A proceedings culminating in the ./2019 Shiv Kumar Gupta Assessing Officer’s assessment framed on 25.03.2013 making the additions in question. There could be hardly any dispute that we are dealing with an “unabated” assessment as on the date of search wherein and any addition has to be made in the assessee’s hands based on the specific seized material only as per PCIT Vs. Abhisar Builwell P. Ltd. (2023) 454 ITR 212 (SC).
We are of the considered view that given the fact that there is no addition made on the basis of the specified seized material, we reject the Revenue’s instant appeal in very terms on this preliminary legal issue.
This Revenue's appeal is dismissed. Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 03/02/2025.
More judgments on Section 153A
- V S A Infra Projects Private Limited… vs DCIT., Central Circle-1(2), HyderabadITA 903/HYD/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed6 Nov 2026AY 2016-17
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, KanchipuramITA 2578/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, OggiamthoraipakkaITA 2577/CHNY/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Saleem vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 3 Nov 2026
- Ms R Ess Iron And Steel PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And OrsGauhati · 3 Nov 2026
- Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee And Anr vs. Galactic Television And Communications PVT LTD And OrsDelhi · 3 Nov 2026
- Society For Human Resource Management Shrm vs. Strategic Hrm & Ors.Delhi · 3 Nov 2026
- Sanjay Kumar Jain & Anr. vs. Nandi Ayurved & Ors.Delhi · 3 Nov 2026