No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AGRA BENCH, “SMC” AGRA
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & SHRI M. BALAGANESH
Assessment Year: 2017-18 Vs. ACIT, Shanti Devi Kushwaha, c/o- J.N. Goyal & Company, Circle-4(2)(1), C-162, Ranjeet Nagar, Farrukhabad, Bharatpur, Rajasthan Uttar Pradesh PAN :DPBPK5044H (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by None Department by Sh. Shailender Shrivastava, Sr. DR Date of hearing 06.02.2025 Date of pronouncement 06.02.2025 ORDER
PER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JM
This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2017-18, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN and order no. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023-24/1059097778(1) dated 27.12.2023 involving proceedings under section 272A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’).
Case called twice. None appears at the assessee’s behest. He is accordingly proceeded ex-parte.
The Revenue vehemently argues during the course of hearing that both the learned lower authorities have rightly levied section 272A(1)(d) penalty of Rs.10,000/- in assessee’s hands on account of the fact that he had not cooperated to the Assessing Officer’s scrutiny notice(s) issued under section 143(2)/142(1) of the Act on various dates. The Revenue could hardly dispute the clinching facts emerging from the case file that it is an instance of faceless assessment wherein possibility of communication gaps in this newly introduced system which requires notices to be served by email etc., could not be altogether ruled out.
That being the case, we are of the considered view that the assessee’s alleged non-cooperation during scrutiny herein was very well justifiable on account of the circumstances beyond his control and, therefore, the impugned penalty forming subject matter of our adjudication deserves to be deleted. Ordered accordingly.