THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. MR ARJUNDAS T SADHWANI
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court dismissed the appeal, following its decision in a similar matter. The court found no substantial questions of law to interfere with the Tribunal's order.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against an ITAT order that confirmed the lower appellate authority's decision. The authorities held that the income shown in the assessee's return did not constitute undisclosed income.
What were the issues?
Whether the income declared by the assessee in their return can be considered as undisclosed income, and if the ITAT's order was sustainable.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
- - - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2013
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE N.KUMAR
AND
THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE RATHNAKALA
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.426 OF 2007
BETWEEN:
The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Central Circle, C.R. Building, Queens Road, Bangalore.
The Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax,
Circle – 1(1),
C.R. Building,
Queens Road,
Bangalore.
.. APPELLANTS
(By Sri. K.V. Aravind & Sri B. Pramod, Advs.)
AND:
Sri. Arjundas T. Sadhwani, No.67/1, Sadhwani Mansion, Lavelle Road, Bangalore .
.. RESPONDENT
(By Sri A. Shankar & Sri M. Lava, Advs.)
This Appeal is filed under Section 260-A of I.T. Act, 1961 arising out of Order dated 22-12-2006 passed in IT(SS)A 90/Bang/2004 for the Block Assessment Year 1988-89 to 1998-99, praying that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to;
- - - 2 - i. formulate the substantial questions of law stated therein,
ii. allow the appeal and set aside the order passed by the ITAT, Bangalore in IT(SS)A 90/Bang/2004 dated 22-12- 2006 confirming the order of the Appellate Commissioner and confirm the order passed by the Asst., Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1(1), Bangalore, in the interest of justice and equity.
This Appeal coming on for hearing this day, KUMAR J., delivered the following:
J U D G M E N T
This appeal is preferred by the Revenue, challenging the order passed by the Tribunal as well as the Lower Appellate Authority in holding that the income shown in the return of the assessee does not constitute undisclosed income.
This Court by even order dated 25th November 2013 has dismissed a similar matter in I.T.A.No.414/2007. In view of the same, this appeal is also dismissed in the terms stated in I.T.A.No.414/2007.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE KNM/-
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S B.K. Agency Under The Proprietor Of Bhola Prasad vs. The Chief Commissioner, CGSTPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026