SUBAITHA KHANI SAGUL HAMEETHU,MANAMELKUDI vs. ITO, WARD-1, PUDUKOTTAI

Aforesaid appeal by legal heir of deceased assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2016-17 arises out of an order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [CIT(A)] dated 31.07.2024 in the matter of an assessment framed by Ld. Assessing Officer [AO] u/s. 147 r.w.s 144 of the Act on 26.05.2023. In the assessment order, Ld. AO made addition of Rs.12.38 Lacs u/s. 56(2(vii) on the ground that the stamp duty value of the purchased property was more than the registered value.

The Ld. AR, at the outset, raised a pertinent legal ground and submitted that the assessment is nullity since the case has been reopened beyond 3 years and quantum of income escaped is less than Rs.50 Lacs. In such a case, the case could not be reopened in terms of Sec.149 (1)(b) which provide that no notice u/s 148 would be issued for relevant AY if three years, but not more than ten years, have elapsed from the end of the relevant AY unless the assessing officer has in his possession books of accounts / documents / evidence etc. which reveal that income chargeable to tax which has escaped assessment amounts to or is likely to amount to Rs.50 Lacs or more. The aforesaid position could not be controverted by revenue.

From assessment order, it emerges that case of the assessee for AY 2016-17 was reopened and notice u/s 148 was issued on 18.07.2022. The case was reopened on the ground that the stamp duty value of the purchased property was more than the registered value by Rs.12.38 Lacs. The same was accordingly added to the income of the assessee u/s 56(2)(vii). The Ld. CIT(A) confirmed the same for want of any representation from the assessee.