THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S VIJAY ASHOK ASSOCIATES
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court held that the appeal was not maintainable due to the monetary limit prescribed for filing appeals. The court applied a departmental instruction setting a limit of Rs. 10,00,000/- for appeals to the High Court.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the High Court challenging an ITAT order that granted benefits to the assessee. The net tax effect of the appeal was Rs. 6,24,000/-.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed by the revenue is maintainable before the High Court given the net tax effect and the departmental monetary limit for appeals.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 10th DAY OF DECEMBER 2013
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N. KUMAR
AND
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE RATHNAKALA
ITA No.245 OF 2007
BETWEEN;
1.The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Central Circle, C.R.Building, Queens Road, Bangalore.
2.The Joint Commissioner of Income-Tax, Special Range-3, Bangalore.
...APPELLANTS
(By Sri.K.V. Aravind, Advocate)
AND:
M/s.Vijay Ashok Associates, No.108, K.H. Road, Bangalore.
...RESPONDENT
(By Sri. A. Shankar, for Sri.M. Lava, Advocate)
-0-0-0-0-0-
This ITA is filed under Section 260-A of I.T. Act, 1961 arising out of Order dated 11.8.2006 passed in IT(SS)A.No.116/Bang/2004 for the Block Assessment
2 Period 1989-90 to 1998-99 to formulate the substantial questions of law stated therein and to allow the appeal and set aside the order passed by the ITAT, Bangalore in IT(SS)A.No.116/Bang/2004 dated 11.8.2006 confirming the order of the Appellate Commissioner and confirm the order passed by the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Special Range-3, Bangalore.
This appeal coming on for hearing this day, N. KUMAR, J. delivered the following:-
JUDGMENT
This is an appeal filed by the revenue challenging the order passed by the Tribunal granting benefit to the assessee. The net tax effect in this appeal is Rs.6,24,000/-. In view of instruction No. 3/2011 issued by the Department prescribing Rs.10,00,000/- as the limit for filing appeals to this Court, which this Court in the case of THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANOTHER vs M/S RANKA AND RANKA [ITA No. 3191/2005] disposed of on 2.11.2011, has held to be retrospective and applicable to pending appeals, the appeal is dismissed as not maintainable only on the
3 ground of the subject matter being within the monetary limit prescribed and without going into any other question.
Sd/-
JUDGE.
Sd/- JUDGE.
*alb/-.
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Ut Corp vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- Sunrise Engineering vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026