Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL & HON’BLE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI
(िनधा�रणवष� / Assessment Year: 2017-2018) Govindaraj Ravi, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Door No.57/30, Venkataraman Street, Ward 1(2), Shevapet, Salem Salem 636 002. [PAN: BERPR 4308J] (अपीलाथ�/Appellant) (��यथ�/Respondent) अपीलाथ� क� ओर से/ Appellant by : Shri. D. Anand, Advocate ��यथ� क� ओर से /Respondent by : Shri. S. Easwar, IRS, JCIT. सुनवाई क� तार�ख/Date of Hearing : 16.12.2024 घोषणा क� तार�ख /Date of Pronouncement : 18.12.2024 आदेश / O R D E R PER MANU KUMAR GIRI (Judicial Member)
This appeal by the assessee is arising out of the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi in order No.ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-25/1067051238(1) dated 26.07.2024. The assessment was framed by the Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(2), Salem for the assessment year 2017-18 u/s.144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter the ‘Act’), vide order dated 22.11.2019.
We have heard the rival contentions and perused the material on record. We found that the ld. CIT(A) has issued notices on twelve occasions and the assessee