MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA,AGRA vs. PRINCIPLE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -1. AGRA , AGRA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee's counsel requested to withdraw the appeal. The Departmental Representative did not object to the withdrawal. The Tribunal considered the request and the lack of objection.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was directed against the order of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1. The assessee moved an application to withdraw the appeal because a fresh assessment order had been passed and accepted by both the assessee and the revenue.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be allowed to be withdrawn as a fresh assessment order has been passed and accepted by the parties.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AGRA BENCH, AGRA
Before: SH. RAMIT KOCHAR & SH. SUDHIR KUMAR
ORDER PER SUDHIR KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Agra [hereinafter referred to as “PCIT”] vide order dated 31.03.2022 pertaining to assessment year 2017-18.
At the outset, the Ld. Counsel for Assessee moved an application dated 21.01.2025 requesting for the permission to withdraw the appeal. The relevant content of the abovementioned application is reproduced as under:
“The present appeal is filed against the order dated 31.03.2022 passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Agra under section 263 of the Act directing the AO to pass fresh Assessment order d-novo. Pursuant to said order the AO has framed the fresh Assessment vide order dated 31.03.2023 (DIN No. ITBA/COM/F/17/2022- 23/1051822692(1)) under section 263/143(3) of the Act which stands accepted by the Assessee and Revenue as well. Xerox Copy of Assessment order is enclosed herewith. (Page-1-4) Assessee is advice to withdraw the appeal filed before the Hon'ble ITAT. It is therefore requested that appeal may kindly be allowed to be withdrawn.”
The Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Departmental Representative) did not object to withdrawal of the appeal by assessee. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn and not pressed.
In view of the aforesaid, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open court on 07.02.2025.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026
- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026