PREMIUM INFRATECH PVT LTD,GURGAON vs. ITO WARD-76, NEW DELHI
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES : C : NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA & SHRI KRINWANT SAHAYAssessment Year : 2015-16
PER ANUBHAV SHARMA, JM:
This appeal is preferred by the assessee against the order dated 13.03.2025
of the Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-2, Chandigarh, (hereinafter referred to as the First Appellate Authority or ‘the ld. FAA’ for short) in appeal
No.NFAC/2013-14/10069814, filed before him against the order dated
14.01.2022 passed u/s 201(1)/201(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) by the Income Tax Officer, Ward-76(3), New Delhi
(hereinafter referred to as the Ld. AO, for short).
2
None appeared for the assessee at the time of hearing and the record shows that notices have been issued repeatedly. No further opportunity is justified. 3. The ld. DR was heard and the record was perused. The issue arises out of the demand raised on account of non-deduction of TDS on External Development Charges (EDC) paid to the Department of Town & Country Planning (DTCP) and the ld. AO has invoked the provisions of section 194C of the Act to allege that the EDC payments were covered u/s 194C of the Act and, therefore, liable to TDS. As with regard to the same, the ld.CIT(A) has relied the decision of the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of Puri Construction (P.) Ltd. vs. Addl.CIT (2024) 159 taxmann.com 444, which holds EDC payments liable to TDS u/s 194C of the Act. We find no reason to interfere. The appeal of the assessee is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 28.11.2025. (KRINWANT SAHAY)
JUDICIAL MEMBER
Dated: 28th November, 2025. dk