PREMIUM INFRATECH PVT LTD,GURGAON vs. ITO WARD-76, NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 3099/DEL/2025Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 November 2025AY 2015-16Bench: SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA (Judicial Member), SHRI KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)3 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal, referring to a decision of the Delhi High Court in the case of Puri Construction (P.) Ltd. vs. Addl.CIT, held that EDC payments are liable to TDS under Section 194C of the Act. No interference was found with the lower authorities' decision.

What were the facts?

The assessee is in appeal against the order of the CIT(A) upholding the demand raised by the AO for non-deduction of TDS on External Development Charges (EDC) paid to the Department of Town & Country Planning. The AO invoked Section 194C of the Act.

What were the issues?

Whether payments made for External Development Charges (EDC) are liable for TDS under Section 194C of the Income Tax Act.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 201(1),Section 201(1A),Section 194C

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES : C : NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA & SHRI KRINWANT SAHAY

For Respondent: Shri Om Prakash, Sr. DR
Hearing: 18.11.2025Pronounced: 28.11.2025

ORDER

PER ANUBHAV SHARMA, JM:

1.

This appeal is preferred by the assessee against the order dated 13.03.2025 of the Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-2, Chandigarh, (hereinafter referred to as the First Appellate Authority or ‘the ld. FAA’ for short) in appeal No.NFAC/2013-14/10069814, filed before him against the order dated 14.01.2022 passed u/s 201(1)/201(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) by the Income Tax Officer, Ward-76(3), New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Ld. AO, for short).

2.

None appeared for the assessee at the time of hearing and the record shows that notices have been issued repeatedly. No further opportunity is justified.

3.

The ld. DR was heard and the record was perused. The issue arises out of the demand raised on account of non-deduction of TDS on External Development Charges (EDC) paid to the Department of Town & Country Planning (DTCP) and the ld. AO has invoked the provisions of section 194C of the Act to allege that the EDC payments were covered u/s 194C of the Act and, therefore, liable to TDS. As with regard to the same, the ld.CIT(A) has relied the decision of the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of Puri Construction (P.) Ltd. vs. Addl.CIT (2024) 159 taxmann.com 444, which holds EDC payments liable to TDS u/s 194C of the Act. We find no reason to interfere. The appeal of the assessee is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on 28.11.2025.

More judgments on Section 201(1)

All 3,835 judgments and leading authorities on Section 201(1) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →