SURENDRA KUMAR GOYAL,AGRA vs. ITO, WARD 2(1)2(2), AGRA

This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2011-12 arises against Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN and Order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023-24/1058546069(1) dated 07.12.2023, in proceedings u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, [hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’].

The assessee pleads in the case file that on account of communication gaps at various levels, the assessee could not appear to plead and prove all the relevant facts in the lower appellate proceedings and therefore, in the larger interest of justice, the matter be restored back to the CIT(A)/NFAC. The Revenue vehemently supports the learned lower authority’s action making the addition(s) herein on merits.

Be that as it may, the fact remains that possibility of some communication gaps at various levels in such an instance of the newly introduced virtual hearing mechanism could not be altogether ruled out. It is therefore deemed appropriate in the larger interest of justice to set aside the assessee’s instant appeal back to the CIT(A)/NFAC for his afresh appropriate adjudication, within three effective opportunities of hearing at the appellant’s risk and responsibility, in consequential proceedings. Ordered accordingly.

This assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes. Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 10.02.2025.