RAJ KUMAR KHARE,GUNA vs. ITO, GUNA
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee sought withdrawal of the appeal due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The revenue did not dispute this withdrawal request. Accepting the AR's prayer, the appeal was considered for dismissal.
What were the facts?
The assessee appealed against an order of the NFAC dated 18.03.2024, concerning an assessment framed under sections 143(3) and 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the Assessment Year 2012-13. The appellant's representative stated that the assessee had opted to settle the dispute under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal can be dismissed as withdrawn on the grounds of opting for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH, AGRA
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL
This assessee is in further appeal before us against the order of NFAC, Delhi DIN and Order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023- 24/1062815339(1) dated 18.03.2024 in the matter of an assessment framed by Ld. AO u/s 143(3) r.w.s 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’.
The Ld. AR stated that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 and accordingly, the assessee seeks withdrawal of the appeal. The relevant forms have been placed on record. The revenue did not dispute the same.
Accepting the prayer of Ld. AR, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in above terms subject to all just exceptions.
Order pronounced in the open court on 10th February, 2025.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026