M/S AGRA MATHURA CITY TRANSPORT SERVICES LTD.,AGRA vs. PR.CIT-1, AGRA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee had opted for settlement of dispute under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024, for the demand arising out of the consequential order. The revenue did not dispute the copy of Form No.1 submitted.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal for assessment year 2015-16 against the revisionary order of the Pr.CIT. The consequential assessment was framed under section 143(3) r.w.s. 263 of the Act. The assessee sought withdrawal of the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme?
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “DB” BENCH, AGRA
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL
This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2015-16 arises against the revisionary order of Ld. Pr.CIT, Agra-1 dated 31-03-2021. The consequential assessment has been framed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 263 of the Act on 31-03-2022.
The Ld. AR sought withdrawal of the appeal on the ground that the assessee has opted for settlement of dispute under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 against demand arising out of consequential order. The copy of Form No.1 has been placed on record which has not been disputed by the revenue.
Accepting the prayer of the assessee, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn subject to all just exceptions.
Order pronounced in the open court on 10th February, 2025.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Biswanath Rana vs. The Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 28 Oct 2026