SH PRAKASH NARAYAN AGRAWAL ,GWALIOR vs. ACIT CIRCLE -2 , GWALIOR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 37/AGR/2022Status: DisposedITAT Agra12 February 2025Bench: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA (Judicial Member), SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL (Accountant Member)1 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted that the CIT(A) had affirmed the Assessing Officer's action without ensuring compliance with Section 250(6) of the Act, which requires framing points of determination before adjudication. Therefore, the Tribunal restored the appeal to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeal for assessment year 2010-11 arose against the order of the CIT(A)/NFAC. The CIT(A) had affirmed the Assessing Officer's action of adding Rs. 20,545/- as short-term capital gain and Rs. 61,90,598/- as business income from the sale of shares.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) followed the due procedure under Section 250(6) of the Income-tax Act before adjudicating the appeal.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 147,Section 250(6)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “DB” BENCH, AGRA

Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL

Hearing: 12.02.2025Pronounced: 12.02.2025

ORDER

PER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER:

1.

This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2010-11 arises against Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN and Order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2021-22/1042155215(1) dated 30.03.202, involving proceedings u/s 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, [hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’].

2.

Heard both the parties at length. Case file perused.

Prakash Narayan Agrawal

3.

It emerges during the course of hearing that the learned CIT(A) has affirmed the Assessing officer’s action adding Rs.20,545/- as short term capital gain and holding profits from sale of shares of Rs.61,90,598/- as business income than capital gains, in the course of assessment framed on 06.03.2014, without having ensured compliance to Section 250(6) of the Act requiring him to first frame the points of determination than followed by speaking adjudication thereof.

4.

That being the case, we deem it appropriate in the larger interest of justice to restore the assessee’s instant appeal back to the learned CIT(A) for afresh appropriate adjudication preferably within three effective opportunities, in consequential proceedings. Ordered accordingly.

5.

This assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the open court on 12.02.2025

More judgments on Section 147

All 49,210 judgments and leading authorities on Section 147 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →