Facts
The assessee, engaged in foodgrain trading, declared a net profit of 8.06% on sales of Rs.51.38 Lacs, with cash withdrawals of Rs.746.45 Lacs. The Assessing Officer (AO) concluded that three undisclosed bank accounts were used, estimating a commission income of 3% on the cash withdrawals and adding Rs.22.39 Lacs to the returned income.
Held
The Tribunal noted that the assessee acted as an 'Arhati' for poor farmers in the unorganized sector, dealing in perishable commodities where stock losses are possible. The initially estimated rate of 3% was not supported by comparable instances. Therefore, the Tribunal directed the AO to estimate commission at 1% on the impugned withdrawals.
Key Issues
Whether the commission income estimated by the AO at 3% on cash withdrawals was justified, considering the nature of the assessee's business and the lack of comparable instances.
Sections Cited
143(3)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH, AGRA
Before: HON’BLE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JM & HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM
आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member)
Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2017-18 arises out of the order of learned Addl. / Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [CIT(A)] dated 01- 07-2024 in the matter of an assessment framed by Ld. Assessing Officer [AO] u/s. 143(3) of the Act on 11-12-2019.
The assessee is stated to be engaged in trading of foodgrains and the assessee declared net profit of 8.06% on sales of Rs.51.38 Lacs. However, the assessee made cash withdrawals of Rs.746.45 Lacs. The assessee, inter-alia, explained that he sold foodgrains on his own behalf as well as on behalf of other farmers. The cash withdrawals were distributed to the farmers against sale of their respective agricultural produce. However, Ld. AO, upon perusal of financial statements, concluded that the assessee did not disclose three bank accounts and the transactions in these bank accounts were undisclosed transactions which were not reflected in the regular books of accounts. The details of these bank accounts have been tabulated in para-7 of the assessment order. In the absence of any cogent explanation forthcoming from the assessee, Ld. AO estimated commission income of 3% against cash withdrawals of Rs.746.45 Lacs and added additional amount of Rs.22.39 Lacs to the returned income of Rs.3.59 Lacs and framed the assessment. The Ld. CIT(A) confirmed the same against which the assessee is in further appeal before us. The only plea urged by Ld. AR is to make reasonable estimation of income considering the fact that the assessee was dealing in perishable commodities. The Ld. Sr. DR opposed any interference in the orders of lower authorities.
We note that the assessee act as Kaccha Galla Arhati making sale and purchase of foodgrains on behalf of poor farmers who happened to fall in unorganized sector. The assessee deal in perishable commodities wherein stock losses could not be ruled out. Further, the estimated rate of 3% is not supported by any comparable instance. Considering all these facts, we direct Ld. AO to estimate the commission @1% on impugned withdrawals and re-compute the income of the assessee.
The appeal stands partly allowed. Order pronounced on 13th February, 2025.