THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S CRANE SOFTWARE INTERNATIONAL LTD.,

PDF · subscribers
ITA/432/2009HC KarnatakaKAHC01054009200909 June 2015Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR5 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court held that the classification of interest income from fixed deposits as business income or income from other sources is a debatable issue. Such debatable issues cannot be rectified under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act.

What were the facts?

The assessee company received interest on fixed deposits, which the revenue sought to reduce from business profits to compute deduction under Section 80HHE. The revenue initiated proceedings under Section 154 to rectify the assessment.

What were the issues?

Whether interest income from fixed deposits used as security for business loans is business income or income from other sources, and if this classification is a debatable issue beyond the scope of Section 154 rectification.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 80HHE,Section 154

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 2015 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M SHANTANAGOUDAR AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR ITA NO.432/2009 BETWEEN:

1.

THE COMMISSINER OF INCOME-TAX

C.R.BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD,

BENGALURU.

2.

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF

INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-I(1),

C.R.BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD,

BENGALURU. …APPELLANTS

(BY SRI.K.V.ARAVIND, STANDING COUNSEL)

AND:

M/S.CRANE SOFTWARE INTERNAITONAL LTD. SHANKARANARAYANA BUILDINGS, BLOCK-I, 4TH FLOOR, 25, M.F.ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001 …RESPONDENT

(BY SRI.A.SHANKAR & M.LAVA, ADVOCATES)

THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 26OA OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW AND ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE IN ITA

NO.1406/BANG/2008 DATED 25.03.2009 CONFIRMING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE – I, BANGALORE.

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, MOHAN M SHANTANAGOUDAR J, DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING :

JUDGMENT

The second Substantial question of law raised in this appeal is covered against the revenue by the Apex Court in the Case of ACG ASSOCIATED CAPSULES (P) LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX reported in 343 ITR 89. Hence, the second substantial question of law is answered accordingly against the revenue.

2.

The first substantial question of law reads thus: 1. Whether the Appellate Authorities were correct in holding that interest income earned from fixed deposits which was to fall within the head ‘Income from Business’ or ‘Income from Other Sources’ and consequently the same would affect the computation of deduction u/s 80HHE of the Act, was held to be a debatable issue, which cannot be rectified u/s 154 of the Act?

3.

This appeal is filed by the revenue and the matter is for the Assessment Year 2003-04. The assessee

filed return of income on 28.11.2003 declaring the income of Rs.6,74,53,080/- for the Assessment Year 2003-04 and same was processed under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on 30.08.2005. Notice was issued under Section 143(2) and same was replied. Subsequently, assessment order came to be passed under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on 16.12.2005.

4.

According to the revenue, on verification of records, it was found that the assessee - company was in receipt of interest on Fixed Deposits at Rs.2,28,80,959/- and TDS was also deducted. Hence, the revenue was of the impression that this being the income from other sources, needs to be reduced from the profit of business to arrive at the deduction under Section 80HHE. Thus, revenue has concluded that same has resulted in excess allowance of 80HHE. Accordingly, proceedings under Section 154 of Income Tax Act, 1961 were initiated and assessee was called upon to furnish its objection.

5.

On re-appreciating the matter, order came to be passed under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as per Annexure-C dated 27.03.2007, whereunder it came to be held that assessee is not entitled to deductions under Section 80HHE of the Act. Appellate Commissioner set aside the order in Appeal No.ITA.No.17/DCIT.Central Circle.1(1)/BLR/CIT(A)-VI/2007-08 vide order dated 19.08.2008 by concluding that, from the records it is found that the Fixed Deposits from which the interest had been earned, has been given as security for Term Loans and Overdrafts in appellant’s business and payment of interest on such Overdrafts and Term Loans far exceeds the receipt of interest received on Fixed Deposits. Appellate Commissioner having concluded that the issue involved in the case was contentious one, annulled the order passed by the Assessing Authority under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Said order of Appellate Commissioner is confirmed by the Tribunal.

6.

We do not find any ground to interfere in the impugned order, inasmuch as, the question as to whether the interest received on Fixed Deposits kept apart for business purposes falls within the business income or income from other sources is debatable point. Such debatable point is beyond the scope of Section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. At an earlier point of time, the Assessing Officer had taken one particular view, since two views were possible. Hence, this is not the case wherein the Authority would have exercised power under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Hence, appeal stands dismissed. Accordingly, substantial question of law is answered against the revenue.

Sd/-

JUDGE

Sd/-

JUDGE DR

More judgments on Section 80HHE

All 103 judgments and leading authorities on Section 80HHE →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →