TECHMART GLOBAL SOLUTIONS,TIRUCHIRAPPALLI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1)0, TIRUCHIRAPPALLI

PDF
ITA 3036/CHNY/2024Status: DisposedITAT Chennai31 December 2024AY 2017-18Bench: SHRI ABY T. VARKEY (Judicial Member), SHRI JAGADISH (Accountant Member)1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed as withdrawn

Facts

The assessee opted for the Direct Tax Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme, 2024. There was a delay of 28 days in filing the appeal, which was condoned. The assessee requested to withdraw the appeal.

Held

The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal. The assessee was permitted to withdraw the appeal as they had opted for the Direct Tax Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme, 2024.

Key Issues

Whether the assessee can withdraw the appeal after opting for the Direct Tax Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme, 2024. Whether the delay in filing the appeal can be condoned.

Sections Cited

Direct Tax Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme, 2024

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH: CHENNAI

Before: SHRI ABY T. VARKEY & SHRI JAGADISH

Hearing: 27.12.2024Pronounced: 31.12.2024

आदेश / O R D E R

PER JAGADISH, A.M : Aforesaid appeal filed by the assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2021-22 arising out of the order of Learned Commissioner of Income Tax, National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi dated 28.08.2024 was listed for early hearing.

ITA No.3036/Chny/2024 :- 2 -:

2.

The Ld. Authorized Representative (A.R) of the assessee, at the

outset stated that assessee has opted for Direct Tax Vivad-se-Vishwas

Scheme, 2024 and therefore, wants to withdraw the appeal. The

request of Ld. AR was accepted and accordingly, the case was listed

for hearing on 27.12.2024.

3.

There is a delay of 28 days in filing the appeal by the assessee.

The assessee has filed condonation petition stating the reasons for

delay in filing the appeal. We have considered the petition of delay in

filing the appeal and satisfied that there was sufficient cause for not

filing the appeal within the prescribed time limit. Hence, the delay is

condoned accordingly.

4.

We have heard both the sides, and perused the materials

available on record. In this case, the assessee has opted for the Direct

Tax Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme, 2024 and filled Form 1 in this regard.

The Designated Authority has also issued Form No.2 for the

settlement of pending tax dispute. The Ld. AR has now made a

request to withdraw the appeal. We allow the assessee to withdraw

the appeal and dismiss the appeal as withdrawn. However, it is open

to the assessee to approach the Tribunal by filing an appropriate

application in the event of any prejudice caused in respect of the

ITA No.3036/Chny/2024 :- 3 -:

settlement of tax dispute under the Direct Tax Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme, 2024.

6.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

Order pronounced on 31st December, 2024.

Sd/- Sd/- (एबी टी. वक�) (जगदीश) (Jagadish) (ABY. T. Varkey) लेखा सद! /Accountant Member �ाियक सद! / Judicial Member चे�नई/Chennai, �दनांक/Dated: 31st December, 2024. EDN/- आदेश क� �ितिल�प अ�े�षत/Copy to: 1. अपीलाथ�/Appellant 2. ��थ�/Respondent 3. आयकर आयु�/CIT, Chennai/Madurai/Coimbatore/Salem 4. िवभागीय �ितिनिध/DR 5. गाड� फाईल/GF

TECHMART GLOBAL SOLUTIONS,TIRUCHIRAPPALLI vs DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1)0, TIRUCHIRAPPALLI | BharatTax