LATE ANITA DODA THROUGH LEGAL HEIR DISHA KHANNA AND ISHA DANGI,JAIPUR vs. ITO WD 1(3), , JPR
Facts
The assessee's appeal was filed with a delay of 9 days due to unfortunate events including the death of the primary assessee, who was aged and ill. The assessee contended that the impugned order was passed ex-parte without adequate opportunity of being heard.
Held
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal. It was held that the CIT(A) erred in passing the ex-parte order without affording sufficient opportunity of hearing to the assessee and without appreciating the facts of the case.
Key Issues
Whether the CIT(A) erred in passing an ex-parte order without affording adequate opportunity of hearing to the assessee. Whether the delay in filing the appeal should be condoned.
Sections Cited
250, 144, 147
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES, “B” JAIPUR
Before: SH. SANDEP GOSAIN & DR. M. L. MEENA
Per Dr. M. L. Meena, AM:
The appeals by the assessee is filed against the order of National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC/CIT(A)), Delhi dated 17.10.2023 in respect of Assessment Years 2012-13.
2 I.T.A. Nos. 812/JPR/2023 Assessment Years: 2012-13 2. There was a delay of 9 days in filing the appeal. The Ld. AR
submitted that the Id. CIT (A)/NFAC’s Order u/s 250 is dated 17.10.2023
(hereinafter referred as impugned order), Accordingly, the appeal was to be filed on/before 17.11.2023 however, the same has been filed on dated
25.12.2023 with a delay of 9 days because Lt. Smt. Anita Doda aged 78
years residing at 5-DA-9, Jawahar Nagar, Jaipur being a very aged person
and a senior citizen, who was not conversant and compatible with the fast
technological developments, which were taking place as continuously being
adapted by the Income Tax Department and further, due to age she was
bad ridden and finally expired on 06.01.2021 (Copy of death certificate is enclosed and marked as "Annexure —A. Thus, due to unfortunate events,
the assessee (through L/ H) was not able to file the appeal. He prayed that
short delay of 9 days may be condoned. The Ld. DR has no objection to
the request of the council of the assessee. Accordingly, the short delay of 9
days in filing the appeal is here by condoned and the appeal is admitted on
merits of the case.
The Id. CIT(A) erred in law as well as on the facts of the case in
passing the impugned order ex-parte, in a haste without affording adequate
and reasonable opportunity of being heard.
3 I.T.A. Nos. 812/JPR/2023 Assessment Years: 2012-13 4. At the time of hearing the Ld. AR contended that the impugned order
has been passed exparte qua the appellant, in gross violation of principles
of natural justice, in confirming the additions made on account of the alleged Long Term 4. Capital Gain in contravention to the provisions of law
and facts of the case. kindly be quashed or alternatively be restored to the
file of the Id. CIT(A).
Per Contra, the learned additional CIT (DR) has no objection to the
request of the council of the assesse.
Heard rival contentions, perused the material on record, impugned
order, written submission and case law cited before us. Admittedly, the Ld.
CIT(A) has passed the order ex parte qua the assesse. The Ld. AR argued
that the worthy CIT(A) decided the case exparte without valid service of
notice at the address given in column 17 of form no. 35 of the appeal
Memo and that while deciding the case ex-parte, the Ld. CIT(A) has not
appreciated the facts of the case and arbitrary confirmed the assessment
order passed u/s 144 r.w.s. 147 of the I.T. Act. It is seen that neither the
AO nor the Ld. CIT(A) has addressed the relevant issue on merits of the
case. He requested that in view of principles of natural justice, the matter
may be sent back to the CIT(A) to adjudicate the appeal afresh as the
4 I.T.A. Nos. 812/JPR/2023 Assessment Years: 2012-13 assasse undertake to present his case before the CIT(A) with detailed
submissions for that the learned additional CIT (DR) has no objection.
In the present case, the assessee could have placed evidence before
the first appellate authority if he has been provided adequate opportunity of
being heard. In view of the principles of natural justice, we consider it deem
fit to restore back the matter to the file of the Ld. CIT(A) to adjudicate the
appeal afresh after considering the written submission and evidence filed
on record and may be filed during the Proceedings. The CIT(A) is directed
to grant sufficient opportunity of being heard to the assesse and to issue a
Show Cause Notice, and thereafter pass a reasoned order in accordance with law. The assesse shall cooperate before the CIT(A).
Accordingly, Assessment order set aside and matter remanded to the
CIT(A) to pass order as per law.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical
purposes.
Order pronounced in open court as on 10.04.2024
Sd/- Sd/- (Sandeep Gosain) (Dr. M. L. Meena) Judicial Member Accountant Member *DOC*
5 I.T.A. Nos. 812/JPR/2023 Assessment Years: 2012-13 Copy of the order forwarded to: (1) The Appellant: (2) The Respondent: (3) The ld. CIT (4) The ld. CIT(A) (5) The DR, I.T.A.T., Jaipur (6) Guard File
By Order, Asstt. Registrar
Date Initial 1. Draft dictated on Doc* 2. Draft placed before author 3. Draft proposed & placed before the 08.04.24 JM/AM Second Member 4. Draft discussed/approved by JM/AM Second Member 5. Approved Draft comes to the Sr. Sr.PS/PS P.S./P.S. 6. Kept for pronouncement on Sr.PS/PS 7. File sent to the Bench Clerk Sr.PS/PS 8. Date on which file goes to the Head Clerk 9. Date on which file goes to the AR 10. Date of dispatch of Order
