BHAGIRATH PAKHRIA,JHANSI vs. WARD 2 (3)(1), JHANSI

PDF
ITA 60/AGR/2024Status: DisposedITAT Agra17 February 2025AY 2015-16Bench: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA (Judicial Member), SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL (Accountant Member)1 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

Facts

The assessee filed an appeal against an order related to assessment year 2015-16. The lower authority refused to condone a significant delay of 314 days in filing the appeal. The Revenue argued that the assessee's explanation for the delay lacked confidence.

Held

The Tribunal found merit in the assessee's condonation application, citing the decision in Collector, Land Acquisition vs. Mst. Katiji & Ors. The Tribunal also quashed the reassessment proceedings under sections 147/148 as the addition was made under section 69A instead of the intended section 50C for capital gains, which was not sustainable.

Key Issues

Whether the delay in filing the appeal should be condoned? Whether the reassessment proceedings invoking section 50C but ending with an addition under section 69A are sustainable?

Sections Cited

147, 148, 50C, 69A, 144

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AGRA BENCH, AGRA

Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL

For Appellant: Ms. Prarthana Jalan, C.A
Hearing: 17.02.2025Pronounced: 17.02.2025

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AGRA BENCH, AGRA BEFORE : SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.60/Agr/2024 Assessment Year: 2015-16

Bhagirath Pakhria, 124, Nanak Vs. Income-tax Officer, Ganj, Sipri Bazar, Jhansi, U.P. Ward 2(3)(1), Jhansi.

PAN : AMDPP6709L (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by Ms. Prarthana Jalan, C.A. Department by Sh. Shailender Shrivastava, Sr. DR

Date of hearing 17.02.2025 Date of pronouncement 17.02.2025

ORDER Per Satbeer Singh Godara, Judicial Member: This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2015-16, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)-NFAC”],Delhi’s DIN and order no. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023-24/1058834137(1) dated 18.12.2023, involving proceedings under section 147 r.w.s. 144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). 2. Heard both the parties at length. Case file perused.

ITA No.60/Agr/2024

3.

It emerges during the course of hearing at the outset that the

learned lower authority has refused to condone the assessee’s 314 days’

delay in filing of the lower appeal instituted on 02.03.2023 against the

assessment order dated 23.03.2022. There is hardly any dispute

between the parties that the assessee has indeed filed its corresponding

explanation attributing the reasons thereof to the circumstances beyond

his control. The Revenue’s case in this backdrop is that the assessee

although has filed explanation for delay in the lower appellate

proceedings, but the same hardly inspire any confidence and therefore, it

has been rightly rejected.

4.

We have given our thoughtful consideration to the assessee’s

lower appeal condonation application and find merit therein. This for the

precise reason that they have indeed made out a case to condone the

delay, in the corresponding averments filed before the lower authorities.

Faced with this situation we condone the delay in light of Collector, Land

Acquisition vs. Mst. Katiji & Ors., (1987) 167 ITR 471 (SC).

5.

We now adjudicate on the merits of the case wherein learned lower

authorities have set into motion section 148/147 proceedings against the

assessee for the reason of computing capital gains by invoking section

50C of the Act, but ended up making section 69A unexplained money

addition only which is not sustainable in light of CIT Vs. Mohmed Juned 2 | P a g e

ITA No.60/Agr/2024

Dadani [(2013) 258 CTR 268 (Guj.), Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. vs. Union

of India (2011) 336 ITR 136 (Del.) and CIT vs. Jet Airways (India) Ltd.

(2011) 331 ITR 236 (Bom.). We, thus quash the impugned reopening on

this first and foremost legal issue which renders all other pleadings as

academic. Ordered accordingly.

6.

This assessee’s appeal is allowed.

Order pronounced in the open court on 17.02.2025

Sd/- Sd/- (MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL) (SATBEER SINGH GODARA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated:17.02.2025 *aks/Subodh Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR Asst. Registrar, ITAT, Agra

3 | P a g e

BHAGIRATH PAKHRIA,JHANSI vs WARD 2 (3)(1), JHANSI | BharatTax