ALKA PARMAR,JAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(1)(1), AGRA, UTTAR PRADESH

PDF · subscribers
ITA 439/AGR/2024Status: DisposedITAT Agra17 February 2025AY 2011-12Bench: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA (Judicial Member), SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL (Accountant Member)1 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal condoned the delay of 160 days in filing the appeal, citing the decision in Collector, Land Acquisition vs. Mst. Katiji & Ors. The matter was restored to the CIT(A)/NFAC for fresh adjudication on merits.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeal for AY 2011-12 was filed against an order of the CIT(A)-NFAC. The assessee failed to appear for the hearing, and the case proceeded ex parte. The CIT(A)/NFAC had refused to condone a delay of 160 days in filing the assessee's lower appeal.

What were the issues?

Whether the delay of 160 days in filing the appeal before the lower appellate authority should be condoned.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 147,Section 144

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AGRA BENCH, AGRA

Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL

Hearing: 17.02.2025Pronounced: 17.02.2025

ORDER

Per Satbeer Singh Godara, Judicial Member:

1.

This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2011-12, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)-NFAC”],Delhi’s DIN and order no. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-25/1068783537(1) dated 18.09.2024, involving proceedings under section 147 r.w.s. 144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’).

2.

Case called twice. None appears at the assessee’s behest. We, accordingly, proceed ex parte against her. assistance coming from the Revenue side that the CIT(A)/NFAC has refused to condone 160 days delay in filing of assessee’s lower appeal instituted on 25.06.2019 against the assessment order dated 17.12.2018. The Revenue could hardly dispute the clinching fact that the assessee had indeed filed her condonation petition explaining various reasons on account of the circumstances beyond her control so as to justify the delay herein of 160 days. That being the case, we hereby quote Collector, Land Acquisition vs. Mst. Katiji & Ors., (1987) 167 ITR 471 (SC) that such a delay explained on account of reasonable cause deserves to be condoned in the larger interest of justice. We accordingly condone the impugned delay and restore the matter back to the CIT(A)/NFAC for his afresh adjudication on merits within three effective opportunities at the sole risk and responsibility of the assessee to plead and prove her case, in very terms.

4.

This assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the open court on 17.02.2025.

More judgments on Section 147

All 49,210 judgments and leading authorities on Section 147 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →