SHOBHIT GARG,AGRA vs. ITO WARD 2(1)(2), AGRA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee sought to withdraw the appeal stating that they had filed a declaration under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2024. The Departmental Representative had no objection to the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal for assessment year 2016-17 against an order of the CIT(A)/NFAC. The appeal arose from proceedings under section 147 r.w.s. 144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee later filed an application to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal can be dismissed as withdrawn upon the assessee's application due to participation in the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AGRA BENCH, AGRA
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL
ORDER
Per Satbeer Singh Godara, Judicial Member:
This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2016-17, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN and order no. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-25/1069721326(1), dated 11.10.2024, involving proceedings under section 147 r.w.s. 144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’).
Case called twice. None appears at assessee’s behest. We, accordingly, proceed ex parte against the assessee.
3. The assessee appears to have filed his application dated 14.02.2025 for withdrawal of the instant appeal, as under:
“In the above reference, appellant had filed an appeal against the CIT(A) Order u/s 250 dt. 17.10.2024 passed by NFAC, Delhi. Later on, appellant preferred to file a declaration under section 91 of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2024 (15 of 2024) in FORM 1 on 13.12.2024 vide acknowledgement no. 752680740131224 for Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 (copy attached). In view of that appellant would humbly request for withdrawal of the above referred appeal before the Hon'ble Bench with immediate effect, Thus, it is requested to treat the appeal as withdrawn.”
Learned departmental representative submits that he has no objection to the instant withdrawal application per se. Ordered accordingly.
This assessee’s appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, subject to all just exceptions. Order pronounced in the open court on 21st February,2025.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Laxman Singh Yadav vs. Bank Of BarodaMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Surendra Singh Rathore vs. Idfc First Bank Through Branch ManagerMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026
- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026