G.VIJAYCHAND JHABAKH (HUF),COIMBATORE vs. DCIT, COIMBATORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee is statutorily required to file an appeal before the CIT(Appeals) before approaching the ITAT. Since this procedural requirement was not met, the appeal filed before the Tribunal was dismissed.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal directly before the ITAT against an order passed by the Assessing Officer. This order was passed consequent to a revision order under Section 263 by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal against an Assessing Officer's order, passed pursuant to a Section 263 revision, can be filed directly before the ITAT without first appealing to the CIT(Appeals).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘D’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI N.R.S. GANESAN & SHRI D.S. SUNDER SINGH
आदेश /O R D E R
PER N.R.S. GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
The assessee has filed the present appeal against the order passed by the Assessing Officer dated 21.12.2016, for the assessment year 2010-11.
We heard Shri G. Vijaychand Jhabak, the Karta of assessee- HUF and Shri R. Durai Pandian, the Ld. Departmental Representative. From the material available on record, it appears that the Assessing Officer passed the impugned order consequent to the order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-2, Chennai, on 21.03.2016 under Section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The order passed by the Assessing Officer is appealable before the CIT(Appeals). The assessee filed the appeal before this Tribunal directly without filing any appeal before the CIT(Appeals). As per the statutory requirement, the assessee is expected to file appeal before the CIT(Appeals) before approaching this Tribunal. At the best, the assessee may file appeal against the order of the CIT(Appeals). Since no appeal was filed before the CIT(Appeals), this Tribunal is of the considered opinion that the appeal filed by the assessee against the impugned order of the Assessing Officer is to be dismissed.
The assessee is at liberty to file appeal before the CIT(Appeals) as per the statutory requirement against the impugned order of the Assessing Officer. In case such an appeal is filed before the CIT(Appeals), the CIT(Appeals) may liberally consider to condone the delay from 10.01.2017, the date on which the appeal was filed before this Tribunal and 28.02.2017, the date on which the appeal is disposed by this Tribunal.
With the above observation, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 28th February, 2017 at Chennai.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026