ACIT, BANGALORE vs. M/S GOLF VIEW HOMES PVT. LTD., BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer had not properly assumed jurisdiction under Section 153C as no incriminating material relating to the assessee was found during the search. Therefore, the additions made were unsustainable.
What were the facts?
A search was conducted at India Builders Corporation, and subsequently, a notice under Section 153C was issued to M/s. Golf View Homes Pvt. Ltd. The Assessing Officer made additions based on this notice, but the CIT(Appeals) deleted them. The Revenue appealed this deletion.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessment under Section 153A read with Section 153C is valid in the absence of incriminating material found during the search, and whether completed assessments can be reopened without such material.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH : BANGALORE
Before: SHRI SUNIL KUMAR YADAV & SHRI ABRAHAM P. GEOERGE
per the provisions of section 153C, notice can only be issued to a person with respect to whom some incriminating material is found and the AO forms a belief that this material relates to the said person. Unless and until the AO forms a belief that such seized material belongs to the third person, the provisions of section 153C cannot be invoked. In the instant case, nothing is brought on record as to what was the incriminating material found during the course of search which relates to the assessee. Therefore, we are of the view that the AO has not assumed jurisdiction to issue notice u/s. 153C of the Act to the assessee. Therefore, we find ourselves in agreement with the findings of the CIT(Appeals). Accordingly, we confirm his order.
In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed.
Pronounced in the open court on this 31st day of May, 2016.
More judgments on Section 153A
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, KanchipuramITA 2578/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, OggiamthoraipakkaITA 2577/CHNY/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Shanmugham Thiagarajan, ChennaiITA 2576/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026
- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026