M/S TUNGANATH REALTORS PRIVATE LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ITO(CPC), BANGALORE, BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) had not provided a finding on the issue as the appeal was decided ex-parte. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the appeal was set aside to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal concerned the addition of Rs. 6,67,301/- as share of profit from a partnership firm for book profit computation under Section 115JB. The CIT(A) had passed an ex-parte order.
What were the issues?
Whether the share of profit from a partnership firm is includible in the computation of book profit under Section 115JB, and whether the ex-parte order of the CIT(A) warrants a remand.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” BENCH : KOLKATA
Before: Hon’ble Sri A.T.Varkey, JM & Shri M.Balaganesh, AM ]
This appeal of the assessee arises out of the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) -17 , Kolkata [ in short the ld CI(A)] in Appeal No.309/CIT(A)- 17/Kol/14-15 dated 16.06.2016 against the order passed by the CPC, Bangalore [ in short the ld AO] under section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act ‘] dated 07.09.2010 for the Asst Year 2009-10.
The only issue to be decided in this appeal of the assessee is as to whether the ld CIT(A) was justified in confirming the addition of Rs.6,67,301/- towards share of profit from the partnership firm in computing the book profit u/s 115JB of the Act in the facts and circumstances of the case. 3. At the outset, we find that the ld. CIT(A) has passed an order ex-parte and the ld. AR prayed before us for setting aside of this issue to the file of the ld. CIT(A). In response to this the ld. DR vehemently relied on the order of the lower authorities.
We have heard the rival submissions. We find that the issue before us is with regard to the inclusion of Rs.6,67,301/- representing profit from partnership firm in the M/s. Tunganath Realtors Private Ltd. A.Yr.2009-10 computation of income u/s 115JB of the Act. This was considered as income u/s 115JB of the Act in the intimation processed by CPC u/s 143(1) of the Act. The ld. AR argued that the share of profit from the partnership firm is exempt u/s 10 of the Act and accordingly the same would be outside the ambit of computation of book profits u/s 115JB of the Act. However, we find that no finding in this regard has been given by the ld. CIT(A) and since the ld. CIT(A) had decided the appeal ex-parte we deem it fit in the interest of justice and fair play to set aside this appeal to the file of the ld. CIT(A) for denovo adjudication of issue with regard to inclusion of profit from the partnership firm in the computation of book profits u/s 115JB of the Act. Accordingly grounds raised
by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.
5. In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the Court on 07.07.2017
More judgments on Section 115JB
- Azure Knowledge Corporation Private… vs The Dy.CIT, Circle-1(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 2013/AHD/2024[2018-19]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Digjam Limited, Jamnagar vs The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 349/RJT/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Braithwaite & Co. Ltd., Kolkata vs DCIT, Circle 1(1), KolkataITA 1076/KOL/2026[2021-2022]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2021-2022
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 964/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur… vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 963/AHD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Fasil Hussain Shah vs. Ut Of J And K Th Commissioner Secretary TO Government Finance Department And OthersJammu and Kashmir and Ladakh · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S. Devkinandan Traders vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Dixit Medical Agencies vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Sukant Kumar vs. Union Of INDIA And 6 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026