CHRISTOPHER EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PASCHIM MEDINIPUR vs. CIT, KOL-XIX, KOLKATA, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that as per Section 12AA(2) and judicial precedents, if the CIT does not pass an order within six months of the application, registration is deemed to be granted. Therefore, the registration should be effective from December 1, 2007.
What were the facts?
The assessee trust applied for registration under Section 12AA of the Income-tax Act on May 31, 2007. The CIT granted registration but effective from November 12, 2014, instead of the date of application or expiry of the statutory period.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the effective date of registration under Section 12AA when the Commissioner fails to act within the prescribed time limit.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Bhagwad Swarup Shri Shri Devraha Baba Memorial Shri Hari Padmarth Dham Trust ( v. CIT Dehradun5 citing111 ITD 175 · 2008 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH: KOLKATA
ORDER
Per Shri A.T.Varkey, JM
This is an appeal filed by the assessee Trust against the order of Ld. CIT, Kol-XIX, Kolkata dated 12.11.2014 for not granting registration u/s. 12AA of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) from the date of inception of the Trust or in the alternative from the date on which the trust applied for registration u/s. 12AA of the Act.
The only issue that has been raised by the assessee Trust is that the assessee applied for registration u/s. 12AA of the Act on 31.05.2007 (Paper book page 1 wherein the seal/stamp of the office of the Ld. CIT and the date of receipt of the application for registration u/s. 12AA of the Act is endorsed as 31.05.2007). The assessee is aggrieved by the fact that the Ld. CIT after making enquiries from the DCIT, Circle-2, Midnapore and JCIT, Range-2, Midnapore and the AO of the assessee was pleased to grant registration u/s. 12A of the Act, since the applicant Trust satisfied all the conditions laid down u/s. 12A of the Act. The only grievance of the assessee is that since it had applied on 31.05.2007 in Form no. 10A before the Ld. CIT, then as per section 12AA(2) of the Act, the Ld. CIT ought to have granted the registration within six months or in the alternative as per the 2 Christopher Educational Trust, Special Bench decision of the Tribunal in Bhagwad Swarup Shri Shri Devraha Baba Memorial Shri Hari Parmarth Dham Trust Vs. CIT, Dehradun (2008) 111 ITD 175 (Del.)(SB) wherein the Special Bench was pleased to hold that in case where Commissioner does not pass or grant an order refusing registration of Trust within six months from the end of the month in which application for registration u/s. 12A of the Act was filed, registration would be deemed to have been granted to Trust automatically on expiry of period specified in sec. 12AA(2) of the Act. Since facts enumerated above do not require any other material for adjudicating the issue before us, we proceed with the same.
We have heard rival submissions and gone through facts and circumstances of the case carefully. We note that the assessee Trust has applied for registration in Form no. 10A which was filed on 31.05.2007. The Ld. CIT has called for report from DCIT, Cir-2, Midnapore and JCIT, Range-2, Midnapore and then the AO of the assessee who in turn have suggested for grant of registration to the assessee Trust u/s. 12A of the Act. The Ld. CIT after going through the documents submitted by the assessee Trust was of the opinion that the assessee Trust satisfied all the conditions laid down u/s. 12A of the Act. However, he granted registration w.e.f. 12.11.2014. The main grievance raised by the assessee before us is that the Ld. CIT ought to have given the registration after the expiry of six months from the date of submission of application in Form 10 i.e. from 31.05.2007 when the documents were submitted and not from 12.11.2014. We find force in the argument of the Ld. AR that as per the Special Bench order in Bhagwad Swarup Shri Shri Devraha Baba Memorial Shri Hari Parmarth Dham Trust (supra) wherein it was held that if the Ld. CIT has not granted registration or refused registration within six months from the end of the month in which an application for registration u/s. 12A of the Act was filed, registration would be deemed to have been granted to the Trust automatically on the expiry of period specified in sec. 12AA of the Act. We note that in Civil Appeal No. 1478 of 2016 in SLP (C) No. 9705 of 2009 the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India by order dated 16.02.2016 in the case of CIT Vs. Society for the Promn. Of Edn, Allahabad, was pleased to uphold the view of the Hon’ble High Court of Allahabad that “once an application is made under the said provision (12AA) and in case the same is not responded to within six months it would be taken that the application is registered under the provision”. The Hon’ble Supreme Court 3 Christopher Educational Trust, upheld the Hon’ble Allahabad High Court’s order and observed that the registration would operate only after six months from the date of application. Hence, we direct the Ld. CIT to grant registration u/s. 12AA of the Act w.e.f 01.12.2007 to the assessee trust and not w.e.f. 12.11.2014 as has been ordered in the impugned order
In the result, appeal of assessee is partly allowed as indicated above. Order is pronounced in the open court on 12.07.2017 Sd/- Sd/- (M. Balaganesh) (Aby. T. Varkey) Accountant Member Judicial Member Dated : 12th July, 2017 Jd.(Sr.P.S.) Copy of the order forwarded to: Appellant – Christopher Educational Trust, Christopher Day School, 1. Malancha Road, P.O. Nimpur, Kharagpur, Dist. Paschim Mednipur, Pin- 721304. Respondent – CIT, Kol-XIX, Kolkata. 2 The DCIT, Kolkata 3. 4. JCIT , Kolkata 5. DR, Kolkata Benches, Kolkata /True Copy, By order,
Sr. Pvt. Secretary
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026