Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE BENCH B, BANGALORE
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE BENCH 'B', BANGALORE SHRI. ABRAHAM P. GEORGE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (Assessment Year : 2009-10) Shri. Madhukesh S. Angadi, No.4, Shri. Basavanagar, Old Hubballi – 580 024 .. Appellant PAN : ADUPA0023C v. Income-tax Officer, Ward -2(2), Hubballi .. Respondent Assessee by : None Revenue by : Shri. S. R. Karuppusami, JCIT Heard on : 02.06.2016 Pronounced on : 10.06.2016 O R D E R PER ABRAHAM P. GEORGE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER :
This is an appeal filed by assessee directed against an order dt 05.06.2015 of the CIT (A)-I, Bangalore, for the A. Y. 2009-10.
When the appeal was called up for hearing, nobody appeared for assessee. It is seen from records that inspite of the date of hearing being ITA.1387/Bang/2015 Page - 2 mentioned in the notice of hearing, which has been issued and served on the assessee by registered post acknowledgement due, nobody was present on the date of hearing. In the circumstances, I am of the opinion that the assessee is not interested in prosecuting its case. I dismiss the appeal following the decision of the Delhi Bench of the ITAT in CIT v. Multiplan India P.Ltd., (1991) 38 ITD 320 and of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of Estate of late Tukoji Rao Holkar v. CWT (1997) 223 ITR 480, as the appeal is infructuous for non-prosecution.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed.
Order pronounced in open court on 10th June, 2016.