READERS DIGEST BOOK AND HOME ENTERTAINMENT INDIA (PVT.) LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 21(1), NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had opted for settlement under the Vivaad Se Vishwas Act and the Revenue agreed with this submission. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order of the Dy. CIT (Appeals). During the pendency of the appeal, the assessee opted for settlement under The Direct Taxes Vivaad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for settlement under the Vivaad Se Vishwas Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, [ DELHI BENCH “I–2”: NEW DELHI ]
Before: SHRI KULDIP SINGHSHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI
O R D E R PER PRASHANT MAHARISHI, A. M.
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order passed by the Dy. CIT (Appeals), Circle 21 (1), New Delhi, dated 30.10.2017, under Section 143(3) read with Section 144C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) for Assessment Year 2013-14.
When the matter is called up for hearing the ld AR of the assessee submitted a letter dated 16.02.2021 wherein, it is submitted that assessee has already opted for settlement of the dispute involved in this appeal under The Direct Taxes Vivaad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 by filing Form Nos. 1 and 2. Subsequently, Form No. 3 as per section 5(1) of the Vivaad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 was also issued to the company on 24.12.2020. 3. The ld. DR also agreed with the above contentions.
ITA 7575/Del/2017 4. In view of the above facts the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. Accordingly, appeal of the assessee is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 17/02/2021.
More judgments on Section 144C
- Mishoo Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 19/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 18/KOL/2026[2016-2017]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2016-2017
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 17/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 16/KOL/2026[2014-2015]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2014-2015
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 15/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sushama Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Saudamini Samantray vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar IiOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Keshav Rice Mill, Ganjam vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, KatakaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Utkal Suppliers,Ganjam vs. Assistant Commissioner Of CT And GST, Ganjam-I Circle,GanjamOrissa · 28 Oct 2026