M/S. ITC EMPLOYEES HOUSING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1(2)(4), BENGALURU
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal. It directed the AO to re-examine whether the assessee's books were audited as per the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act and if the return was filed within the extended due date, to decide the 80P deduction on merits.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a co-operative society, claimed a deduction under section 80P. The return of income was filed belatedly, and the CPC denied the deduction. The CIT(A) confirmed the disallowance, stating the assessee had not provided proof of audit under the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee is entitled to the deduction under section 80P when the return was filed belatedly, and if the audit under the state co-operative societies act grants an extended due date for filing the return.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 80P,Section 139(1),Section 250,Section 143(1),Section 80AC
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH : BANGALORE
Before: SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K & SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU
Per George George K, Vice President:
This appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed against CIT(A)’s order dated 09.01.2023, passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called ‘the Act’). The relevant Assessment Year is 2018-19.
There is a delay of 273 days in filing this appeal. Assessee has filed a petition for condonation of delay accompanied by affidavit of secretary of assessee society stating therein the reasons for late filing of this appeal. We have perused the reasons stated in the affidavit for belated filing of this appeal and we are of the view that there is reasonable cause and no latches can be attributed to the assessee for belated filing of this appeal. Hence, we condone the delay of 273 days in filing this appeal and proceed to dispose off the same on merits.
The solitary issue that is raised is whether CIT(A) is justified in confirming the disallowance made by the AO of claim of deduction under section 80P of the Act, amounting to Rs.57,85,021/-.
Brief facts of the case are as follows:
Assessee is a co-operative society registered under the Karnataka Co- operative Societies Act, 1959. For the Assessment Year 2018-19, the return of income was filed on 29.09.2018 declaring total income of Rs.1,56,510/-, after claiming deduction of Rs.57,85,021/- under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act. The CPC processed the return vide the intimation dated 29.06.2019 wherein the claim of deduction under section 80P of the Act was denied for the reason that return of income was belatedly filed by the assessee.
Aggrieved by the Order of Assessment, assessee filed appeal before the First Appellate Authority (FAA). Before the FAA, it was submitted that there is no delay in filing the return of income. It was stated that assessee was liable to get its books of accounts audited under the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 [section 63(16)]. Hence, the due date for filing the return of income in the case of the assessee was 31.10.2019 and assessee had filed the return well within the said time i.e., on 29.09.2018. The CIT(A), however, rejected the appeal of the assessee. The CIT(A) observed that in the return of income, assessee had stated that it is not liable to get its books of accounts audited. Further, the CIT(A) observed that assessee has not furnished any proof that its books of accounts are audited under the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959.
Aggrieved by the Order of CIT(A), assessee has filed the present appeal before the Tribunal. Assessee has filed a Paper Book comprising of 136 pages enclosing therein copy of the balance sheet along with copy of audit report in vernacular, free English translation of the audit report under the Karnataka Co- operative Societies Act, 1959 for the relevant Assessment Year, copy of the notice issued during the course of appellate proceedings, reply submitted by the assessee, etc. The learned AR reiterated the submissions made before the CIT(A). The learned AR has also taken us through the audit report of the assessee, which was in compliance under the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959.
The learned DR supported the order of the CIT(A).
We have heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. Assessee had made claim of deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act, amounting to Rs.65,81,021/-. The claim of deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act, was denied for the reason that return of income was filed beyond the due date specified under section 139(1) of the Act. It is a case of the assessee that its books of accounts were audited as per section 63(16) of the Karnataka Co- operative Societies Act, 1959. Hence, the due date for filing the return of income in the case of the assessee was on or before 31.10.2018 (extended due date) as per explanation 2(a)(ii) to section 139(1) of the Act. Assessee has also made a claim of deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act, before the CIT(A). The CIT(A), however, rejected the claim of the assessee for the reason that assessee had not furnished the audit report, hence, assessee would not be entitled to the extended time for furnishing the return of income i.e., on or before 31.10.2018.
Assessee fairly admits that while filing the return of income by mistake assessee had stated that it is a non-audit case. Consequently, the CPC processed the return by intimation under section 143(1) of the Act by disallowing the claim of deduction due to the amended provision of section 80AC of the Act. Before us, assessee had produced the audited books of accounts under the Karnataka Co- operative Societies Act, 1959, for the relevant Assessment Year. Assessee submits that a copy of the same was uploaded before the FAA (NFAC). However, the same was not taken note of by the CIT(A) and a decision was taken against the assessee. In the interest of justice and equity, we are of the view that the matter needs to be examined afresh by the AO. Accordingly, the matter is restored to the files of the AO. The AO is directed to examine whether assessee had got its books of accounts audited as per Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959, and if so, whether assessee would be entitled to extended time limit for filing the return i.e., within 31.10.2018 as per explanation 2(a)(ii) under section 139(1) of the Act. If it is found that return of income is filed within due date specified under section 139(1) of the Act, the claim of deduction under section 80P of the Act is to be decided on merits. It is ordered accordingly.
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
More judgments on Section 80P
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shri Na vs Ari Khedut Sahkari Society Ltd…ITA 362/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026
- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026