LATE (MRS.) MIRA GAUTAM,KASGANJ vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3(3), KASGANJ, KASGANJ
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had passed away and was represented by her daughter. Considering this, the Tribunal decided to provide another opportunity for the legal representative to present the case. Therefore, the order of the CIT(A) was set aside.
What were the facts?
The appeal was filed by the assessee for AY 2015-16 against an order of the CIT(A), which upheld the Assessing Officer's order. The AO had made significant additions, increasing the total income from Rs. 5.93 Lacs to Rs. 65.90 Lacs. The CIT(A) had dismissed the assessee's appeal for non-prosecution.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) rightly dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution without affording a reasonable opportunity to the legal representative after the assessee's demise?
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “DB” BENCH, AGRA
Before: HON’BLE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JM & HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM
आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member)
Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2015-16 arises out of an order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [CIT(A)] dated 14-07- 2023 in the matter of an order passed by Ld. Assessing Officer [AO] u/s. 143(3) of the Act on 26-12-2017. The registry has noted delay of 255 days in the appeal which stand condoned.
In the assessment order, Ld. AO made various additions and determined total income of Rs.65.90 Lacs as against returned income of Rs.5.93 Lacs. The Ld. CIT(A) dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution.
Considering the fact that the assessee has left for heavenly abode and represented by her daughter, we deem it fit to afford another opportunity of hearing to the legal representative (LR) to substantiate its case before Ld. CIT(A). Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and the appeal is restored back to the file of Ld. CIT(A) for de novo adjudication after affording reasonable opportunity of hearing to the LR who, in turn, is directed to substantiate the case of the assessee.
The appeal stand allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced u/r 34(4) of Income Tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963.
More judgments on Section 34(4)
- Shri Tariq Ahmad Dar, Anantnag vs Income Tax Officer Ward, UdhampurITA 422/ASR/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed12 Mar 2026AY 2017-18
- Alkeshkumar Maganbhai Patel, Bharuch vs Income Tax Officer (ITO), Ward 1(1)…ITA 292/SRT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed30 Oct 2025AY 2017-18
- Inbox Pictures Private Limited, Mumbai vs DCIT, Circle-16 (1), MumbaiITA 3774/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed30 Oct 2025AY 2017-18
- Mangal Compusolution Limited, Mumbai vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Central…ITA 5172/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed28 Oct 2025AY 2022-23
- Mahesh Katragadda, Hyderabad vs DCIT., Central Circle-1(2), HyderabadITA 659/HYD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2025AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of Hte Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Govindjee Dairy Milk Private Limited vs. Central Goods And Services TaxRajasthan · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026