PRITI NIMISH PATEL,MUMBAI vs. DCIT - CC-25, MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 3069/MUM/2015Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 March 2017AY 2010-112 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal followed its previous order and the Supreme Court's decision in Shambhu Investments Pvt. Ltd. It held that rental income from a building is assessable under the head 'income from house property'.

What were the facts?

The assessee offered income of Rs. 26.40 lakhs under the head 'income from house property'. The AO assessed this income under the head 'business income', which was confirmed by the CIT(A). The assessee's appeal is based on this issue.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was whether rental income should be taxed as 'income from house property' or 'business income'.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 132,Section 153C,Section 24

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Order u/s.254(1)of the Income-tax Act,1961(Act) लेखा लेखा सद"य लेखा लेखा सद"य सद"य राजे"" सद"य राजे"" राजे"" केकेकेके अनुसार राजे"" अनुसार अनुसार PER RAJENDRA, AM- अनुसार Challenging the order dated 23/02/2015,of the CIT(A)-51,Mumbai,the assessee has filed the present appeal.Assessee,an individual,is carrying on business of manufacturing and sale of metallic yarn.During the year under appeal,she was also director of one company.Effective ground of appeal is about taxability of Rs. 26.40 lakhs under the head business income. Brief facts: 2.A search and seizure operation u/s.132 of the Act was conducted in the case of Patel Engineering Ltd. group of cases, on 16/12/2010. After recording satisfaction, a notice u/s.153C of the Act was issued to the assessee asking her to file the return of income for the year under consideration.She filed her return on 16/01/2013, declaring total income at Rs. 21.48 lakhs.Later on, on 27/02/2013, the assessee filed a revised return disclosing income of Rs. 15.89 lakhs.The assessee had offered income of Rs. 26,40,000/-was offered under the head income from house property, whereas, the AO following the order for the AY.2010-11 assessed the said income under the head business income. In the appellate proceedings, the First Appellate Authority (FAA)confirmed the order of the AO. 3.Before us the representatives of both the sides agreed that the issue stands decided in favour of the assessee by the order of the Tribunal dated 27/07/2016(ITA/3070/Mumbai/2015,AY. 2011-12).We would like to reproduce the said order and it reads as under: “2.The only grievance of the assessee relates to assessing rental income of Rs.29,04, 000/-offered under the head income from house property,as business income.

More judgments on Section 132

All 14,598 judgments and leading authorities on Section 132 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →