THE CENTRAL HOMOEOPATHIC AND BIOCHEMIC ASSOCIATION,GWALIOR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER 1(2) GWALIOR, GWALIOR
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee's Authorized Representative (AR) conceded that the assessee did not possess the necessary registration to claim the impugned accumulation. Consequently, the Tribunal admitted the appeal but confirmed the actions of the lower authorities.
What were the facts?
The assessee appealed an order for AY 2015-16, which denied accumulation of 15% of gross receipts as the assessee lacked registration under sections 12A or 80G. The CIT(A) confirmed this denial. The appeal was filed with a delay of 743 days.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee is eligible for accumulation of 15% of gross receipts without requisite registration under sections 12A or 80G.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH, AGRA
Before: HON’BLE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JM & HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM
(िनधा�रणवष� / Assessment Year:2015-16) The Central Homeopathic Income-tax Officer, बनाम/ and Biochemic Association Ward 1(2), Gwalior. Mahadji Nagar Chrwai Naka, Vs. Shivpuri Link Road, Gwalior. �थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. AABTT-7788-B (अपीलाथ�/Appellant) : (� थ� / Respondent) अपीलाथ�कीओरसे/ Appellant by : Sh. Rajendra Sharma, Adv. – Ld. AR � थ�कीओरसे/Respondent by : Sh. Shailender Shrivastava – Ld. DR सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date of Hearing : 20-02-2025 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date of Pronouncement : 22.04.2025 आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member) 1. Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2015-16 arises out of an order passed by learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), NFAC, Delhi [CIT(A)] on 16-08-2022 in the matter of an assessment framed by Ld. Assessing Officer [AO] u/s. 143(3) of the Act on 18-12-2017. In the assessment order, Ld. AO denied accumulation as claimed by the assessee to the extent of 15% of gross receipts since the assessee was not registered u/s 12A or u/s 80G. The Ld. CIT(A) confirmed the same against which the assessee is in further appeal before us. The registry has noted delay of 743 days in the appeal.
During hearing, Ld. AR fairly stated that the assessee is not having requisite registration to lay its claim on impugned accumulation. This being the case, we admit the appeal and confirm the action of lower authorities.
The appeal stand dismissed. Order pronounced u/r 34(4) of Income Tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963.
More judgments on Section 12A
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Surya Prakash Aroma vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Govindjee Dairy Milk Private Limited vs. Central Goods And Services TaxRajasthan · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. V J Petro Products vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St) - IiiAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026