LATE SMT. PREMO THROUGH HER SON DHARAMBIR SINGH,PANIPAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD- 3, PANIPAT, PANIPAT

PDF · subscribers
ITA 3518/DEL/2025Status: DisposedITAT Delhi02 December 2025AY 2010-11Bench: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara, Judicial Member & Sh. Manish Agarwal (Accountant Member)2 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the appellant's locus standi was not established. Therefore, the appeal was restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication and verification of the appellant's status as the legal representative.

What were the facts?

The appellant, claiming to be the legal representative of the deceased assessee, filed an appeal. The primary issue was the appellant's locus standi to file the appeal as no material was provided to establish his status as the legal representative or manager of the deceased's estate.

What were the issues?

The key legal issue was whether the appellant had the legal standing to file the appeal as the legal representative of the deceased assessee, given the lack of supporting documentation.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 147,Section 144,Section 159

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘E’, NEW DELHI

Before: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara & Sh. Manish Agarwal

For Respondent: Ms. Ankush Kalra, Sr. DR
Hearing: 02.12.2025Pronounced: 02.12.2025

Asstt. Year: 2010-11 Late Smt. Premo through her son Vs Income Tax Officer, Dharambir Singh, Ward-3, H. No. 28, Binjhol, Panipat, Panipat, Haryana-132103 Haryana-132103 (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. EGBPP2099P Assessee by : Sh. Amit Kaushik, Adv. Revenue by : Ms. Ankush Kalra, Sr. DR Date of Hearing: 02.12.2025 Date of Pronouncement: 02.12.2025 ORDER

Per Satbeer Singh Godara, Judicial Member:

1.

The appellant herein Sh. Dharambir Singh; claiming himself to be the legal representative of the deceased assessee Smt. Premo, has filed appeal for Assessment Year 2010-11, arises against the CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi’s DIN & order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-25/1075094935(1) dated 27.03.2025, in proceedings u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

2.

Heard both the parties at length. Case file perused.

3.

It emerges during the course of hearing that there arises the first and foremost issue of the appellant’s locus standi to institute his instant appeal as the legal representative of the Late Smt. Premo through her son Dharambir Singh deceased assessee Smt. Premo who is stated to be left for her heavenly abode. The assessee has admittedly not filed any material on record inter alia indicating that either he is managing the state of the deceased assessee or succeeded to the same or the department has proceeded against him u/s 159 of the Act; as the case may be.

4.

The fact also remains that the learned CIT(A)/NFAC has not considered this vital issue in his lower appellate discussion. It is thus deemed appropriate in the larger interest of justice that the appellant’s instant appeal to be restored back to the learned assessing authority for his afresh appropriate adjudication and verification of the entire issue afresh as per law. It is made clear that the appellant Sh. Dharambir Singh shall first prove his status as the legal representative as per law in consequential proceedings, in preceding terms.

More judgments on Section 147

All 49,210 judgments and leading authorities on Section 147 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →