UPS WORLD WIDE FORWARING INC,MUMBAI vs. ADIT (IT)-2(2), MUMBAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee to withdraw the appeals. The issues in the appeals were resolved through MAP proceedings between India and USA, as confirmed by the Competent Authority.
What were the facts?
The assessee requested to withdraw three appeals for assessment years 2001-02, 2002-03, and 2006-07. The reason for withdrawal was that the issues involved had been settled in Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP) proceedings.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals can be withdrawn as the underlying issues have been settled through Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP) under the India-USA Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Rule 44H(4)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “L”, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI RAJENDRA & SHRI C.N. PRASAD
Heard together (3 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
आदेश / O R D E R PER C.N.PRASAD (J.M.) : These three appeals are filed by the Assessee against various orders of the Ld. CIT (Appeals) for the assessment years 2001-02, 2002-03 and 2006-07.
2 M/s UPS Worldwide Forwarding Inc. &3261/Mum/2006 and 8839/Mum/2010, A.Ys.2001-02, 2002-03 and 2006-07 2. At the outset, the Ld. Counsel referring to the letters dated 07.03.2017 filed by Assessee requesting for withdrawal of appeals, seeks permission of the Tribunal to withdraw these three appeals for the reason that the issue in all these three appeals are settled in MAP proceedings for the assessment years 2001-02 to 2013-14. The Ld. Counsel submits that the order of the Ld. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation) dated 17.02.2017 directing to grant relief to the Assessee as per the provisions and conditions laid down in Rule 44H(4) is placed on record.
The Ld. DR has no serious objection in Assessee withdrawing the appeals.
We have heard both the sides, perused the petition filed by the Assessee for withdrawal in all these cases as under : “UPS Worldwide Forwarding Inc., USA PAN: AAACU5661Q Assessment Year ('AY'): 2001-02 Company's Appeal No.ITA No.3260/M/06 Request for withdrawal of appeal under Rule 44H(4)of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 We refer to the captioned appeal in the case of our client - UPS Worldwide Forwarding Inc. ('UPSWWF' or the 'Company'). The main issue involved in the subject appeal is alleged constitution of Permanent Establishment ('PE') of the Company in India under Article 5 of the India-USA Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement ('DTAA'). For this main issue, the Company had filed a Mutual Agreement Procedure ('MAP') application with the Competent Authority in India through the Competent Authority of USA in accordance with the provisions of Article 27 of the DTAA. We would like to inform that a resolution has been achieved in UPSWWF's case for AYs 2001-02 to 2013-14 under MAP between the Competent Authority of 3 M/s UPS Worldwide Forwarding Inc. &3261/Mum/2006 and 8839/Mum/2010, A.Ys.2001-02, 2002-03 and 2006-07 India and USA - copy of the Letter No. F.No.480/08/2007-FTD-1 (Pt.) dated 17 February 2017 read with Corrigendum dated 2 March 2017 from Foreign Tax & Tax Research Division - I, APA - I ('FT&TR') communicating the MAP resolution is enclosed as Annexure. UPSWWF has accepted the resolution achieved under MAP and since the issues involved in the captioned appeal is now adjudicated under MAP, the Company is withdrawing the captioned appeal. Post withdrawal of Company’s appeal on the main issue, we request the Tax Department that it may also withdraw its appeal in ITA No. 2995/M/05, which is on the issue of attribution to the said alleged PE.”
The contents of this letter is common for all the three years before us.
In view of the above submissions, we dismiss the appeals of the Assessee as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open court on the 29th day of March 2017.
Sd/- Sd/- RAJENDRA C.N.PRASAD लेखा सदस्य / न्याधयक सदस्य / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER मुंबई / Mumbai; दिनाुंक / Dated 29/03/2017 LR, SPS
4 M/s UPS Worldwide Forwarding Inc. &3261/Mum/2006 and 8839/Mum/2010, A.Ys.2001-02, 2002-03 and 2006-07
आदेश की प्रधिधलधप अग्रेधिि / Copy of the Order forwarded to :
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026