ASST CIT 31(1), MUMBAI vs. DIAMOND TOOLS INDUSTRIES, MUMBAI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal in limine. This was based on CBDT Circular No. 21 of 2015, which precludes the Revenue from pursuing appeals with a tax effect below ₹10 lakhs.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed an order of the CIT(A) regarding a deduction claimed by the assessee under Section 80IB. The tax effect involved in the appeal was less than ₹10 lakhs.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue is precluded from pursuing an appeal due to a low tax effect, as per CBDT circulars.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” Bench, Mumbai
Before: Shri B.R. Baskaran (AM)
The Revenue has filed this appeal challenging the order dated 31.8.2016 passed by the learned CIT(A)-42, Mumbai and it relates to A.Y. 2009-10.
At the time of hearing learned AR submitted that the only issue disputed by the Revenue relates to deduction claimed by the assessee u/s. 80IB of the Act to the tune of ` 3,81,891/-. He submitted that the tax effect involved in this appeal is less than ` 10 lakhs and hence, in view of the Circular No. 21 of 2015 dated 10.12.2015 issued by CBDT, the Revenue is precluded from pursuing this appeal.
Learned Departmental Representative did not dispute this factual aspect. Accordingly, I dismiss this appeal filed by the Revenue in limine as the tax effect involved in this appeal is less than ` 10 lakhs and the Revenue is precluded from pursuing this appeal as per Circular referred above.
In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed.
Order has been pronounced in the Court on 3.5.2017.
More judgments on Section 80IB
- D.C.I.T., Circle - 10(1), Kolkata vs M/S. Berger Paints India Ltd., KolkataITA 740/KOL/2018[2013-14]Status: Disposed22 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- Tasa Foods Private Limited, Bangalore vs DCIT, Circle-7(1)(1), BengaluruITA 2908/BANG/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed7 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Uflex Limited, Delhi vs DCIT/ACIT Cen Cir-II, NoidaITTPA 280/DEL/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed21 Aug 2026AY 2022-23
- Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Noida vs Uflex Limited, DelhiITTPA 272/DEL/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed21 Aug 2026AY 2020-21
- Uflex Limited, Pamposh Enclave, Greater… vs DCIT/ACIT Cen Cir-II, NoidaITTPA 260/DEL/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Aug 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026
- M/S Barnala Steel Industries Private Limited vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026