K.GANGADHARAN,NAGAPATTINAM vs. ACIT, THANJAVUR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 545/CHNY/2017Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 April 2017AY 2001-20022 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee. This decision was based on the principle that if an assessee fails to appear, they are deemed not interested in pursuing the appeal.

What were the facts?

The assessee did not appear for the hearing of the appeal despite receiving a notice. No authorized person appeared on behalf of the assessee. The Tribunal considered this as a lack of interest in prosecuting the case.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the non-prosecution of the appeal by the assessee due to their absence during the hearing.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ (SMC

Before: SHRI ABRAHAM P. GEORGE]

For Respondent: Shri. M. Murali Mohan, JCIT

आदेश / O R D E R

When the appeal was called up for hearing, none appeared on behalf of assessee. Despite issue of notice to the address given in Form No.36, no authorized person has appeared on behalf of the assessee. In the circumstances, I am of the opinion that the ITA No. 545/Mds/2017 :- 2 -: assessee is not interested in prosecuting the case. Following the decision of the Delhi Bench of the Tribunal in the case of CIT v. Multiplan (India) Ltd. (38 ITD 320) (Del), I dismiss the appeal filed by the assessee, for non-prosecution.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed. 2.

Order pronounced on Thursday, the 27th day of April, 2017, at Chennai.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →