Facts
The assessee, a co-operative society, claimed deduction under section 80P for Rs. 41.90 Lacs. The CPC denied this deduction solely on the ground that the return was not filed by the due date. The assessee contended that the return was filed within the extended due date.
Held
The Tribunal held that the CPC's denial of deduction based on the due date was incorrect as the return was filed within the extended period. The CIT(A) also erred in going beyond the scope of section 143(1) processing and disallowing the deduction on merits.
Key Issues
Whether the deduction under section 80P can be denied if the return of income is filed within the extended due date, and whether the CIT(A) can go beyond the scope of processing under section 143(1) to disallow the deduction.
Sections Cited
80P, 80P(2)(d), 80P(2)(a)(i), 143(1), 154
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH, AGRA
Before: HON’BLE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JM & HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM
O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member) 1. Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2019-20 arises out of an order passed by of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), NFAC, Delhi [CIT(A)] on 25-11-2021 in the matter of an rectification intimation issued by CPC u/s 154 on 11-07-2020 denying deduction as claimed by the assessee u/s 80P. Having heard rival submissions and upon perusal of case records, the appeal is disposed-off as under.
The assessee is a registered co-operative society providing credit facility to its members against interest. The assessee claimed deduction u/s 80P for Rs.41.90 Lacs which was denied by CPC solely on the ground that the return was not filed within due date. The assessee stated that the return was filed on 28-09-2019 which was well within extended due date. The Ld. CIT(A) concurred with the same. However, Ld. CIT(A) went ahead to disallow the deduction claimed on interest income u/s 80P(2)(d) on the ground that interest income other than from co-operative society and co-operative bank is not eligible for deduction u/s 80P and accordingly, dismissed the appeal of the assessee. Aggrieved, the assessee is in further appeal before us.
From the facts, it is quite clear that CPC denied the impugned deduction solely on the ground that the return was not filed within due date. The assessee established that the return was filed on 28-09-2019 which was well within extended due date. The Ld. CIT(A) concurred with the same. This being admitted fact, the denial of impugned deduction by CPC would have no legs to stand since while processing the return of income u/s 143(1), only prima-facie adjustment could be done by CPC. Once the reason to disallow the impugned deduction was well addressed by the assessee, Ld. CIT(A) could not traverse beyond the scope of processing of return of income u/s 143(1). The Ld. CIT(A), in our opinion, has enhanced the scope of processing of return of income by going into the merits of the deduction. It is another fact that the assessee derives interest income from its members and it is otherwise eligible to claim the said deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) itself. On both these counts, the impugned denial of deduction stand reversed. The Ld. AO is directed to re-compute the income of the assessee.
The appeal stand allowed.
Order pronounced u/r 34(4) of Income Tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963.
Sd/- Sd/- (SATBEER SINGH GODARA) (MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL) 4ाियक सद5 /JUDICIAL MEMBER लेखा सद5 /ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated: 22.04.2025 आदेश की 7ितिलिप अ9ेिषत / Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ�/Appellant 2. � थ�/Respondent 3. आयकरआयु3/CIT 4. िवभागीय�ितिनिध/DR 5. गाड9फाईल/GF ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
ITAT AGRA