Loading judgment…
Facts
The assessee's appeal was directed against an order by the CIT(E), Jaipur, concerning Section 12AB(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. During the hearing, the assessee's Authorized Representative requested to withdraw the appeal.
Held
The Departmental Representative (DR) had no objection to the withdrawal of the appeal. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the assessee to withdraw the appeal.
Key Issues
Whether the appeal can be dismissed as withdrawn.
Sections Cited
12AB (1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES,”A” JAIPUR
Before: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, JM & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 69/JP/2024
ORDER PER: RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of the ld. CIT(E), Jaipur dated 19-05-2023 in the matter of Section 12AB (1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. During the course of hearing, the ld. AR of the assessee has prayed for 2.1 withdrawal of the appeal for which ld. DR has no objection. Hence, we allow to withdraw the appeal.
Sd/- Sd/- ¼ Mk0 ,l- lhrky{eh ½ ¼ jkBksM deys'k t;UrHkkbZ ½ (Dr. S. Seethalakshmi) (Rathod Kamlesh Jayantbhai) U;kf;d lnL;@Judicial Member ys[kk lnL;@Accountant Member Tk;iqj@Jaipur fnukad@Dated:- 18/06/2024 *Mishra आदेश की प्रतिलिपि अग्रेf’ात@ब्वचल वf जीम वतकमत वितूंतकमक जवरू 1. The Appellant- Brahman Samaj, Jaipur ,. 2. izR;FkhZ@ The Respondent- The ITO, Ward- 7(1), Jaipur . 3. vk;dj vk;qDr@ The ld CIT 4. vk;dj vk;qDr¼vihy½@The ld CIT(A) 5. विभागीय प्रतिनिधि] आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर@क्त्ए प्ज्Aज्ए Jंपचनत 6. xkMZ QkbZy@ Guard File (ITA No. 69/JP/2024) vkns'kkuqlkj@ By order,
सहायक पंजीकार@Aेेज. त्महपेजतंत